A comparative study on thrombelastography and routine coagulation tests in chronic renal diseases

王琦,王艳,陈富华,周华,王筱霞
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2016.21.027
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore and compare the clinical significance of routine coagulation tests and thromboelastography(TEG)in as-sessment of blood coagulation status in patients with chronic renal diseases(CKD). Methods A total of 108 inpatients were enrolled and divided into 5 groups in accordance with the grading of renal dysfunction:CKD stages 1 - 2,CKD stage 3,CKD stage 4 and CKD stage 5 without hemodi-alysis,and CKD stage 5 with hemodialysis,their routine coagulation tests,TEG and estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)were analyzed and compared respectively. Results ① There was no statistical difference found in TT,APTT,PT,INR,Fib and D - dimer among different groups ( P < 0. 05). ②Statistical differences were noted in R,K,MA,Angel and CI value among different groups( P > 0. 05). ③Correlation analysis of routine coagulation tests,TEG and eGFR demonstrated positive correlation among R,K and eGFR( P < 0. 05),while negative correlation was found between D - Dimer and eGFR( P < 0. 05). Conclusion TEG can be a choice of preference compared to routine coagulation tests for its higher sensitivity in monitoring status of blood coagulation. A combination of both tests may bring more clinical implications.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?