Abstract:Internal medicine wards in all 8 university hospitals in the Netherlands participated in this prospective study of fever of unknown origin (FUO) from January 1992 until January 1994 in order to update information on the spectrum of diseases causing FUO. We used fixed epidemiologic entry criteria to achieve completeness of enrollment and to avoid unintended selection bias. After entry, immunocompetent patients were included using criteria for FUO according to Petersdorf and Beeson (30). A standardized diagnostic protocol was used, and potentially diagnostic clues (PDCs) and their use in the diagnostic process were prospectively registered. Thus, the criteria of classic FUO have been adjusted to modern times: immunocompromised patients are excluded, and the time-criterion "1 week in hospital without a diagnosis" has been replaced by a quality-criterion stating that certain investigations must be performed as a minimum, and PDCs must be followed adequately for at least 1 week, without a diagnosis being reached. A total of 167 immunocompetent patients with FUO were thus retrieved, of whom 43 (25.7%) had infections, 21 (12.6%) had neoplasms, and 40 (24.0%) had noninfectious inflammatory diseases. No diagnosis was made in 50 patients (29.9%), 37 of whom recovered spontaneously. This study confirms the changing spectrum of diseases causing FUO. Indeed, as shown by another recent study, the group of patients with FUO in whom no diagnosis can be made is expanding, and mostly it concerns self-limiting or benign fevers. Others have suggested that this trend is not really occurring (29). We did not place patients with diseases of unknown origin in the "nondiagnosis" group, and indeed made presumptive diagnoses when necessary. Nevertheless, this category of undiagnosed fevers is increasing. We believe that the higher percentage of undiagnosed cases can be attributed to the greater use of advanced diagnostic techniques attendant on an increased number of self-limited illnesses in patients meeting criteria for FUO. Because of ongoing development in diagnostic techniques and the prospective influence on the spectrum of diseases causing FUO, studies should be performed regularly to update information on this subject. Because the number of outpatient evaluations for FUO is expected to increase, patients seen on an outpatient basis should be included in future studies. To avoid unwanted selection bias, fixed epidemiologic entry criteria should be used to ensure completeness of enrollment. To shorten the period of collecting data, multicentric studies can be done using standardized diagnostic protocols. In patients with recurrent fever or fever lasting longer than 6 months, the chance of reaching a diagnosis is significantly lower, and especially in this group one should exercise the greatest caution to avoid abundant and extensive diagnostic procedures. The diagnostic process in patients with FUO remains an intriguing problem in medicine. Recent microbiologic techniques may be useful as an approach to the relatively large proportion of patients in whom we now fail to make a diagnosis.

A retrospective study on fever of unknown origin and the distribution of causes of common fever

[An Analysis of Etiologies of Fever of Unknown Origin in 372 Patients].

Fever of Unknown Origin: Report of 107 Cases in A University Hospital

Reason Analysis on 187 Patients with Fever of Unknown Origin(fuo)

Clinical analysis of 215 consecutive cases with fever of unknown origin

Fever of Unknown Origin: Revisit of 142 Cases in A Tertiary Chinese Hospital

Retrospective Analysis of 1,641 Cases of Classic Fever of Unknown Origin

A research of diagnostic value of clinical common inflammatory markers on fever of unknown origin

Distribution of the causes of fever of unknown origin in China, 2013-2022

[Chinese Literature Review of Etiology Distribution of Adult Patients with Fever of Unknown Origin from 1979 to 2012].

Investigator-Determined Categories for Fever of Unknown Origin (FUO) Compared With International Classification of Diseases–10 Classification of Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With a Proposal for Revised FUO Classification

Fever of unknown origin (FUO). I A. prospective multicenter study of 167 patients with FUO, using fixed epidemiologic entry criteria. The Netherlands FUO Study Group

Structured diagnostic scheme clinical experience sharing: a prospective study of 320 cases of fever of unknown origin in a tertiary hospital in North China

Fever of Unknown Origin (FUO) Criteria Influences Diagnostic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Infectious causes of fever of unknown origin in developing countries: An international ID-IRI study

18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in fever of unknown origin: data from a large single-center cohort

The changing pattern of fever of unknown origin in the Republic of North Macedonia

Multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and management of fever of unknown origin: A case report

Current situation and cost-effectiveness of <SUP>18</SUP>F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of fever of unknown origin and inflammation of unknown origin: A single-center, large-sample study from China

Comparison of diagnostic spectrum between inflammation of unknown origin and fever of unknown origin: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Etiological Study of Fever in Elderly Patients