Correlation between anthropometric parameters and muscle mass in hemodialysis patients

Jing LI,Ying WANG,Min TAN,Meng-he YUAN,Lei WANG,Mei-shun CAI,Xin-ju ZHAO,Li ZUO
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2017.011.005
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective Malnutrition which we prefer to call protein energy wasting (PEW) is an indepen-dent risk factor for mortality in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. Muscle tissue is the largest protein storage pool in human body and is also an indicator for PEW. The relationship between traditional anthropo-metric parameters and lean tissue mass (LTM) was rarely reported. This study aims at identifying the correla-tion between anthropometric indices and LTM and at finding a simple method for clinical assessment of mus-cle mass. Methods MHD patients were recruited in the hemodialysis unit of Peking University People's Hos-pital. Patients'demographics and primary cause of ESRD were collected. Body mass index (BMI) was calcu-lated. Upper arm circumference, arm muscle circumference, triceps skinfold thickness, grip strength (HGS) and body composition monitor (BCM) were examined pre-dialysis. LTM and lean tissue index for patients (LTI, LTM/height2) were recorded, and serum albumin was assayed. Independent t-testing was used to com-pare mean values between males and females. Pearson correlation was performed to correlate anthropometric and serum variables with LTM and LTI.Regression method was used to derive an estimation equation. Re-sults A total of 52 MHD patients (28 males and 24 females) were included in this study. The average age of the patients was 51.6±12.2 years, and the median dialysis vintage was 65.5 months. There were significant dif-ferences between genders in albumin, HGS, LTM and LTI (t=2.400, 6.412, 5.485 and 3.330, respectively;P=0.020,<0.001,<0.001 and 0.002, respectively). Pearson correlation analysis showed that only HGS correlat-ed with LTM and LTI (r=0.686 and 0.486, respectively; P<0.001 and <0.001, respectively). Regression method was used to derive an estimation equation. Conclusions There were significant differences in nutri-tional indices and body composition between males and females. HGS had a better correlation with LTM and LTI, and may be used to evaluate muscle volume simply and noninvasively.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?