Values of bedside high-frequency ultrasound and mobile digital radiography to the diagnosis of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis

Na LIU,Weikang PAN,Lan ZHANG,Qi ZHOU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13507/j.issn.1674-3474.2018.09.021
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the value of bedside high-frequency ultrasound versus mobile digital radiography (DR) to the diagnosis of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Methods Sixty-five neonates with NEC received bedside high-frequency ultrasound and mobile DR. The image differences and detection rates for NEC were compared between two methods. Results In 65 neonates, mobile DR showed 27 cases of bowel dilatation, 14 of intestinal obstruction, 7 of pneumatosis intestinalis,1 of portal venous gas,2 of intestinal perforation and 14 of intestinal gas reduction sign,while beside high-frequency ultrasound showed 21 cases of intestinal wall echo enhancement, 57 of intestinal wall thickening, 28 of pneumatosis intestinalis, 7 of portal venous gas, 36 of intestinal obstruction, 29 of immature intestinal development, 28 of no ascites echo sign, 21 of ascites echo sign,7 of intestinal perforation and 4 of meconium peritonitis. The detection rates of high-frequency ultrasound for pneumatosis intestinalis, portal venous gas, perforation and ascites (43.08%, 10.77%, 10.77%,75.39%) were significantly higher than those of mobile DR (10.77%,1.54%, 3.08%,0) (P<0.05). Conclusion High-frequency ultrasound has higher detection rates than mobile DR for various signs of NEC in neonates.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?