Strategy to Prevent Intestinal Perforation in Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatic Tumors

CHEN Min-hua,YAN Kun,DAI Ying,YANG Wei,GAO Wen,LIAO Sheng-ri,WU Wei,ZHANG Xiao-peng,HUANG Xin-fu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-8475.2005.04.006
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the reasons of intestinal injury or perforation in radiofrequency (RF) ablation of hepatic tumors adjacent to intestines, to establish a preventive strategy and investigate its clinical efficacy. Methods To prevent colon perforation, a preventive strategy was established and applied to 55 cases with 59 tumors which were adjacent to colon or small intestines. They were closely followed up with CT or ultrasound. Results Twenty-one cases (38.2%, 21/55) complained persisted abdominal pain at various degrees 3-72 hours after the procedure. Of the 48 cases which were examined with ultrasound or CT within 7 days after treatment, 12 (25.0%) were found to have thickened or edematous bowel walls in the right upper abdomen. Small amount of fluid was found between the liver and bowels in 6 cases (12.5%) with significant bowel wall edema, of which 2 had undergone prior cholangioenterostomy. All the 12 cases had prior right upper quandrant surgery or 2 to 3 sessions of RF treatment for tumors adjacent to the bowels. After adopting the corresponding measures during and after the procedure, the pain in 10 cases was obviously relieved, while in 2 cases the discomfort persisted for 4 to 6 months. On the 3 month follow-up ultrasound or CT, 8 cases demonstrated bowels adhension and no intestinal perforation occurred. The success rate of single session of RF treatment was 89.8% (53/59 tumors) with a recurrence rate of 15.3% (9/59 tumors) in this study. Eleven cases (20.0%) were subsequently converted to surgery or intraoprative RF ablation and other methods. Conclusion Prior right upper quandrant surgery and repeated RF ablation of tumors adjacent to bowels are high risk factors of bowel injury in RF treatment. Adopting the preventive strategy during and after the procedure can effectively reduce the possibility of bowels perforation and broaden the indications of percutaneous RF treatment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?