MR diffusion kurtosis imaging versus standard diffusion imaging: changes with radiation in uterine cervical carcinoma xenografts

Kun CAO,Shuai WANG,Bo ZHAO,Xiao-ting LI,Lei TANG,Ying-shi SUN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2017.09.008
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To explore the changes of diffusion-kurtosis imaging (DKI) derived parameters after radiation treatment in cervical cancer xenografts, comparing with traditional apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. Materials and Methods:HELA cell cervical cancer xenografts were built with one tumor in inguinal region and one tumor in contralateral side axillary cavity for each mouse. Radiation were performed on groin area with a single dose of 15 Gy, taking axillary tumors as non-treated contrast. MRI were performed before radiation (pre) and at the 7th day (post) after radiation on a 1.5 T scanner using phase-array animal coil. Maps of mean kurtosis (MK), mean diffusivity (MD) and ADC values were generated with in-house-made software developed in Matlab. Regions of interests covering whole tumor were drawn for each lesion. Average and median values of MK, MD and ADC, respectively, were acquired and the relationships were compared. Differences before and after radiation were compared within treated group and the contrast group using paired sample t test. Results: Strong negative relation of ADC and MK, and strong positive relation of ADC and MD were seen before radiation (r>0.7). After radiation, treated tumors got increased ADC (ADCav 0.571±0.063×10-3 mm2/s v.s. 0.611±0.055×10-3 mm2/s, P=0.015. ADCm 0.543±0.052×10-3 mm2/s v.s. 0.587±0.041×10-3 mm2/s, P=0.013) and decreased MK (MK 1.14±0.12 v.s. 1.02±0.10, P=0.003. MKm 1.13±0.10 v.s. 1.14±0.10, P=0.003) while MD tended to increase but with no statistical significance (MDav 0.856±0.105×10-3 mm2/s v.s. 0.885±0.071× 10-3 mm2/s, P>0.05. MDm 0.843±0.113×10-3 mm2/s v.s. 0.878±0.081×10-3 mm2/s, P>0.05). The average changing rates were 9.4% for MK and 7.5% for MD. No differences were found in the contrast group. Conclusions: Both ADC and MK were able to change with radiation treatment for cervical cancer, in which MK got higher changing rate, thus making DKI hold the potential to use as a tool in therapy evaluation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?