Values of qualitative assays for anti-ds-DNA and anti-nucleosome antibodies in diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus

Na LI,Ning KONG,He-jian ZOU,Wei-guo WAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12025/j.issn.1008-6358.2018.20170355
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To assess the diagnostic value of immunoblot assay for anti-double stranded DNA (ds-DNA) antibodies and anti-nucleosome antibodies (ANuA),and crithidia luciliae based indirect immunofluorescence for anti-ds-DNA antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients.Methods:The levels of anti-ds-DNA antibodies and ANuA in sera of 166 patients in active stage of SLE (including initial and recurrent patients) were detected by irnmunoblotting,crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).The values of qualitative detections for anti-dsDNA antibodies and ANuA in diagnosing SLE were evaluated taking ELISA as standard.Results:The positive coincident rate of immunoblotting for anti-ds-DNA antibodies and ANuA was 73.33% and 66.28%,respectively.The positive coincident rate of crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test for anti-ds-DNA antibodies was 68.57%.The positive coincident rates of immunoblotting and indirect immunofluorescent assay were both decreased with titers of anti-ds-DNA antibodies and ANuA (P<0.05).Conclusions:The positive rates in diagnosis of SLE are not ideal using qualitative assays for ds-DNA antibody and ANuA,therefore,qualitative assay is recommended to be applied based on ELISA.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?