Diagnostic Efficacy Of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography For Small Renal Cell Carcinoma
Xin-Chun Yuan,Ai-Yun Zhou,Li Chen,Fan Xiao,Li-Yun Luo,Cheng Zhang,Jian-Xin He,Yan Zhang
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To analyze the characteristics of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) on the small renal cell carcinoma (SRCC), and to discuss the application and clinical significance of CEUS in the diagnosis of SRCC. Methods: From April 2011 to February 2015, Eighty-nine patients with 89 renal lesions who had undergone CEUS were retrospectively studied. All of the lesions were histopathologically proved. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was performed using low-acoustic power modes and a sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent. The conventional ultrasonography (US), contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and CEUS images were analyzed respectively. The conventional US was mainly used to observe the position, size, shape, border, echogenicity and blood supply of tumor. The dynamic change of the enhancement from the cortical phase to the late phase, the enhancement patterns, degree of enhancement and pseudocapsule at different phases were evaluated by CEUS. The accuracy rate, visualization rate of blood flow, visualization rate of pseudocapsule and focal necrosis area were compared between the conventional US and CEUS. Study on comparison with the results between CEUS and CECT. Results: Among these 72 renal lesions, 55 clear cell carcinomas, 3 chromophobe cell carcinomas, 3 papillary carcinomas, 1 acidophilic cell adenoma (malignant potentially) and 10 angiomyolipomas (AML) were confirmed through postoperative histopathologically. The accuracy rate, visualization rate of blood flow, visualization rate of pseudocapsule and focal necrosis area of lesions display rate of SRCC by the conventional US and CEUS are 76.3% (55/72), 65.2% (47/72), 13.9% (10/72), 11.1% (8/72) and 90.2% (65/72), 100.0% (72/72), 75.0% (54/72), 62.5% (45/72), respectively. CEUS had the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy for SRCC diagnostic efficacy of 95.1% (59/62), 60.0% (6/10), 93.6% (59/63), 66.6%(6/9), and 90.2% (65/72), respectively. The lesions of small renal cell carcinoma mostly were manifested as abundant blood-supply, and showed CEUS pattern of "fast-in and slow-out, hyperenhancement, heterogeneous enhancement and perilesional rim-like enhancement". The detection rate of blood flow in CEUS was 100%. CEUS can effectively reflect the blood supply of the lesions compared with baseline sonograms, and can sensitively display pseudocapsule and necrotic area of lesions, so has higher diagnostic sensitivity. The differences between them were statistically significant (P< 0.001). The difference in diagnosis on SRCC by CEUS and CECT has no statistic significance (P> 0.05). Conclusion: The CEUS has higher sensitivity in showing low-speed blood flow and microcirculation blood supply situation within SRCC compared with conventional US. It is helpful to the diagnosis of SRCC, and has a certain clinical value. CEUS and CECT complement each other in the diagnosis of SRCC.