Application of apparent diffusion coefficient of MRI diffusion-weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of low- and high-grade meningiomas
汪红梅,谢强,廖琴,邓克学,吕洋,陈传玉
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20200304-00063
2020-01-01
Abstract:Objective:This work aims to explore the clinical value of conventional MRI combined with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the differential diagnosis of low- and high-grade meningiomas.Methods:Retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data obtained from 68 patients with meningioma [(29 males and 39 females, aged 24-78 (48.62±10.28) years] in the First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China from January 2018 to August 2019. Among these patients, 52 had WHO grade Ⅰ meningioma (low grade group), 12 had WHO grade Ⅱ, and 4 had WHO grade Ⅲ(high grade group). All patients underwent routine MRI and diffusion weighted imaging(DWI) examination prior to their operation. Comparison of MRI signs, diffusion-weighted imaging characteristics, ADC values of meningioma parenchyma and peritumoral edema, and relative apparent diffusion coefficient (rADC) of tumor parenchyma and contralateral white matter was conducted between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve was used to analyze the diagnostic efficacy of best rADC values for low- and high-grade meningiomas.Results:No statistical difference was found in the baseline data of the two groups (all
P values>0.05). High-grade meningioma presents a high occurrence frequency of these imaging signs, such as irregularity on tumor edge, uneven enhancement, marginal edema, meningeal tail and cyst changes, necrosis, and calcification, and the differences reached a statistical significance (all
P values<0.05). Among the cases of low-grade meningioma, 32 showed equal signals on DWI and ADC, and 14 showed slightly high signal on DWI and slightly low signal on ADC. Sixteen cases of high-grade meningioma showed high signal on DWI, cystic changes, hemorrhagic necrosis, and calcified areas but low signal on ADC. The ADC and rADC values of the parenchyma of low-grade meningioma were (0.94±0.14)×10
-3 and (1.16±0.18)×10
-3 mm
2/s, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of high-grade meningioma at (0.73±0.11)×10
-3 and (0.95±0.14)×10
-3 mm
2/s, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (
t=5.491, 4.277, all
P values<0.01). The ADC and rADC values of the peritumoral edema area of low-grade meningioma were (1.82±0.19)×10
-3 and (2.29±0.24)×10
-3 mm
2/s, respectively, those of high-grade meningioma were (1.88±0.21)×10
-3 and (2.38±0.29)×10
-3 mm
2/s, respectively, no significant differences were observed between two groups (all
P values>0.05). The best critical points for diagnosing low- and high-grade meningiomas were rADC value of 1.035×10
-3 mm
2/s, sensitivity of 88.5%, and a specificity of 87.5%.
Conclusions:Conventional MRI combined with DWI ADC value has important clinical value for the differential diagnosis of low- and high-grade meningiomas.