Oxygen Therapy in Patients with Acute MyocardiaI Infarction: A Sys-temic Review and Meta-AnaIysis

Peng-shu ZHANG,Yan WANG,Li-hui ZHOU,Xiang-yang ZHANG,Xu-yan CHEN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2019.10.006
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of oxygen therapy versus no oxygen therapy in post–acute myocardial infarction settings.Method A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted for randomized studies, which reported cardiovascular events in oxygen versus no ox?ygen therapy. The evaluated outcomes were all-cause mortality, recurrent coronary events (ischemia or myocardial infarc?tion), arrhythmias and pain . The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed by Cochrane scale.Results Our meta-analysis included a total of 7 studies with 3 805 patients who received oxygen therapy and 3806 patients without oxygen therapy. Oxygen therapy did not decrease the risk of all-cause mortality (RR , 0.986; 95% CI,0.81~1.20; P=0.253,I2%=25%), recurrent ischemia or myocardial infarction (RR, 1.241;95%CI,0.9~1.58; P=0.236,I2=27.9%), occurrence of ar?rhythmia events (RR, 0.982; 95% CI,0.85~1.14; P=0.22,I2=30%),and pain (RR, 1.009; 95% CI,0.86~1.19; P=0.047,I2=62.2%) compared with the no oxygen therapy.Conclusions This meta-analysis confirms the lack of benefit of routine ox?ygen therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction with normal oxygen saturation levels .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?