Abstract:<span class="a-plus-plus abstract-section id-a-sec1"><h3 class="a-plus-plus">Background/purpose of the study</h3><p class="a-plus-plus">Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) has been widely used in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is generally believed that the long-term outcomes of LH are not inferior to open hepatectomy (OH). However, the quality of evidence is low. The purpose of this study was to reconstruct time-to-event data for meta-analysis based on Kaplan–Meier curves from propensity-score matched studies and compare survival rates following LH and OH for hepatocellular carcinoma.</p></span><span class="a-plus-plus abstract-section id-a-sec2"><h3 class="a-plus-plus">Methods</h3><p class="a-plus-plus">All published propensity-score matched studies reported in English that compared LH and OH for hepatocellular carcinoma with Kaplan–Meier curves were screened. Patients' survival information was reconstructed with the aid of a computer vision program. Different models (fixed-effects model for two-stage survival analysis and Cox regression for one-stage survival analysis) were performed for sensitivity analysis. In addition to the primary meta-analysis, two specific subgroup analyses were performed on patients by types of resection, cirrhosis status.</p></span><span class="a-plus-plus abstract-section id-a-sec3"><h3 class="a-plus-plus">Results</h3><p class="a-plus-plus">Time-to-event data were extracted from 45 propensity-score matched studies (<em class="a-plus-plus">N</em> = 8905). According to the time-to-event data and the reconstructed Kaplan–Meier curves, the cumulative overall survival rate was 49.0% and 50.9% in the LH and OH cohorts, respectively, a log-rank test did not demonstrate statistical significance (<em class="a-plus-plus">p</em> > 0.05). The cumulative recurrence-free survival (RFS) probability was both close to 0.0%. The median RFS time was 49.1 (95% CI 46.1 ~ 51.7) and 44.3 (95% CI 41 ~ 46.1) months. The difference in disease status was statistically significant by the Log-rank test (<em class="a-plus-plus">p</em> < 0.05). Using the random-effects model of two-stage analysis, the minor hepatectomy subgroup (HR = 1.32, 95% CI [1.09, 1.55], <em class="a-plus-plus">I</em><sup class="a-plus-plus">2</sup> = 6.2%, <em class="a-plus-plus">p</em> = 0.383) and the shared fragile model of one-stage analysis (HR = 1.44 95% CI [1.23, 1.69], <em class="a-plus-plus">p</em> < 0.001) suggested that LH could significantly prolong RFS of patients compared with OH. This result was consistent with sensitivity analysis using different models.</p></span><span class="a-plus-plus abstract-section id-a-sec4"><h3 class="a-plus-plus">Conclusion</h3><p class="a-plus-plus">This study was the first reconstructed time-to-event data based on a high-quality propensity-score matching study to compare the survival outcomes of LH and OH in the treatment of HCC. Results suggested that LH can improve RFS in patients with HCC undergoing minor hepatectomy and may also benefit long-term RFS in overall patients.</p></span>

Clinical effects minimally invasive laparoscopy and traditional open hepatectomy on the patients with liver cancer

Meta-analysis of efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for hepatocarcinoma.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of High-Quality Case-Matched Studies

Laparoscopic Versus Open Major Hepatectomy For Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

Laparoscopic Right Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis of Outcomes Compared with Conventional Open Surgery.

Perioperative Outcomes Comparing Laparoscopic with Open Repeat Liver Resection for Post-Hepatectomy Recurrent Liver Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The comparative analysis of clinical curative effect of laparoscopic hepatectomy and open resection for hepatic tumor

Clinical Evaluation of Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Colon Cancer

Under the Guidance of the Concept of Precise Anatomical Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic and open hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with liver cirrhosis: a systematic review

Therapeutic effects of laparoscopic minimally invasive treatment on rectal cancer and its effects on anorectal dynamical indexes and tumor markers levels

Long-term and short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: might laparoscopic approach be better in early HCC?

Open versus laparoscopic hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Laparoscopic or open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Effects of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy on liver function

Survival analysis between laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis based on reconstructed time-to-event data

Surgical and Oncological Outcomes after Laparoscopic Vs. Open Major Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Laparoscopic Versus Open Hepatectomy in Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Application of Clinical Nursing Pathway in Nursing Care of Patients with Laparoscopic Hepatec-tomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients

Is laparoscopic liver resection safe for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? A meta-analysis

The comparison of oncologic and clinical outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma