Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and standardized uptake values (SUV) with overall survival in patients with primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using 18F-FDG PET/MRI
Nils Martin Bruckmann,Julian Kirchner,Johannes Grueneisen,Yan Li,Angela McCutcheon,Clemens Aigner,Christoph Rischpler,Lino M Sawicki,Ken Herrmann,Lale Umutlu,Benedikt Michael Schaarschmidt,Lino M. Sawicki
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109422
IF: 4.531
2021-01-01
European Journal of Radiology
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Objectives</h3><p>To investigate if the combined analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and standardized uptake values (SUV) measured in <sup>18</sup>F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/MRI) examinations correlates with overall survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Material and methods</h3><p>A total of 92 patients with newly diagnosed, histopathologically proven NSCLC (44 women and 48 men, mean age 63.1 ± 9.9y) underwent a dedicated thoracic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/MRI examination. A manually drawn polygonal region of interest (ROI), encompassing the entire primary tumor mass, was placed over the primary tumor on fused PET/MR images to determine the maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUV<sub>max</sub>; SUV<sub>mean</sub>) as well as on the ADC maps to quantify the mean and minimum ADC values (ADC<sub>mean</sub>, ADC<sub>min</sub>). The impact of these parameters to predict patient's overall survival was tested using hazard ratios (HR). Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated to assess dependencies between the different values. A p-value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>In all 92 patients (n = 59 dead at time of retrospective data collection, mean time till death: 19 ± 16 month, n = 33 alive, mean time to last follow-up: 56 ± 22 month) the Hazard ratios (HR) as independent predictors for overall survival (OS) of SUV<sub>max</sub> were 2.37 (95% CI: 1.23-4.59, p = 0.008) and for SUV<sub>mean</sub> 1.85 (95% CI: 1.05-3.26, p = 0.03) while ADC<sub>min</sub> showed a HR of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.57-1.59, p = 0.842) and ADC<sub>mean</sub> a HR of 2.01 (95% CI: 1.2-3.38, p = 0.007). Furthermore, a combined analysis for SUV<sub>max</sub>/ADC<sub>mean</sub>, SUV<sub>max</sub> / ADC<sub>min</sub> and SUV<sub>mean</sub>/ADC<sub>mean</sub> revealed a HR of 2.01 (95% CI: 1.10-3.67, p = 0.02), 1.75 (95% CI: 0.97-3.15, p = 0.058) and 1.78 (95% CI: 1.02-3.10, p = 0.04).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>SUV<sub>max</sub> and SUV<sub>mean</sub> of the primary tumor are predictors for OS in therapy-naive NSCLC patients, whereas the combined analysis of SUV and ADC values does not improve these results. Therefore, ADC values do not further enhance the diagnostic value of SUV as a prognostic biomarker in NSCLC.</p>
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging