Abstract:Objective: Cesarean scar pregnancy may lead to varying degrees of complications. There are many treatment methods for it, but there are no unified or recognized treatment strategies. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to observe the efficacy and safety of treatment modalities for patients with cesarean scar pregnancy. Data sources: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from their inception to January 31, 2024. In addition, relevant reviews and meta-analyses were manually searched for additional references. Study eligibility criteria: Our study incorporated head-to-head trials involving a minimum of 10 women diagnosed with cesarean scar pregnancy through ultrasound imaging or magnetic resonance imaging, encompassing a detailed depiction of primary interventions and any supplementary measures. Trials with a Newcastle-Ottawa scale score <4 were excluded because of their low quality. Methods: We conducted a random-effects network meta-analysis and review for cesarean scar pregnancy. Group-level data on treatment efficacy and safety, reproductive outcomes, study design, and demographic characteristics were extracted following a predefined protocol. The quality of studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tools for randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle‒Ottawa scale for cohort studies and case series. The main outcomes were efficacy (initial treatment success) and safety (complications), of which summary odds ratios and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve using pairwise and network meta-analysis with random effects. Results: Seventy-three trials (7 randomized controlled trials) assessing a total of 8369 women and 17 treatment modalities were included. Network meta-analyses were rooted in data from 73 trials that reported success rates and 55 trials that reported complications. The findings indicate that laparoscopy, transvaginal resection, hysteroscopic curettage, and high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage demonstrated the highest cure rates, as evidenced by surface under the cumulative ranking curve rankings of 91.2, 88.2, 86.9, and 75.3, respectively. When compared with suction curettage, the odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for efficacy were as follows: 6.76 (1.99-23.01) for laparoscopy, 5.92 (1.47-23.78) for transvaginal resection, 5.00 (1.99-23.78) for hysteroscopic curettage, and 3.27 (1.08-9.89) for high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage. Complications were more likely to occur after receiving uterine artery chemoembolization, suction curettage, methotrexate+hysteroscopic curettage, and systemic methotrexate; hysteroscopic curettage, high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage, and Lap were safer than the other options derived from finite evidence; and the confidence intervals of all the data were wide. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that laparoscopy, transvaginal resection, hysteroscopic curettage, and high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage procedures exhibit superior efficacy with reduced complications. The utilization of methotrexate (both locally guided injection and systemic administration) as a standalone medical treatment is not recommended.

Application of Clinical Nursing Pathway in Interventional Therapy of Caearean Scar Pregnancy

Retrospective Study Of Patients With Cesarean Scar Pregnancies Treated By Uterine Artery Chemoembolization And Curettage

Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Case Series

Individualized therapy for caesrean scar pregnancy：79 cases

Efficacy of different treatment of 134 cases of cesarean scar pregnancy

Analysis on Clinical Effects of Dilation and Curettage Guided by Ultrasonography Versus Hysteroscopy after Uterine Artery Embolization in the Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

Application of Clinical Nursing Pathway in Nursing Care of Patients with Laparoscopic Hepatec-tomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients

Application of clinical pathway in perioperative care of patients with intracranial aneurysms

Study on the Effect of Nursing Intervention to Relieve Pain after Cesarean Section

Efficacy and safety of treatment modalities for cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Approaches to Management of Caesarean Scar Pregnancy:A Comparative Study

Application of comprehensive nursing combined with ISBAR handover approach in the nursing of patients with placental abruption

Application of standardized ultrasound in diagnosis and treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy

Effect of Nursing Intervention Program for Women post-Caesarean Section regarding Self-Care on their Psychological status and Postoperative Pain

Clinical Analysis on Hemostasis Ways in Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

Effect of Comprehensive Nursing Intervention Under Internet-Based WeChat Platform Education on Postoperative Recovery of Puerperae Undergoing Cesarean Section

Effect of psychological nursing intervention combined with acupressure on postoperative recovery of women after cesarean section

Efficacy comparison of two different treatments to cesarean section scar diverticulum:scar excision and repair by laparoscopy combined hysteroscopy and progesterone cycle therapy

Clinical analysis on laparoscopy combined with hysteroscopy in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy

Hidden impact of clinical pathway on patient satisfaction — A controlled trial in elective cesarean section

Effect of midwife intervention coupled with acupressure on the vaginal delivery rate and negative emotion in parturients with scarred uterus re-pregnancy