Abstract:Objective: To investigate the value of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) in the differential diagnosis and blood perfusion evaluation of benign and malignant hepatic lesions. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for 86 patients (96 lesions) with pathologically or clinically confirmed hepatic lesions or hepatic lesions diagnosed based on follow-up results, among whom 48 had malignant lesions (53 lesions) and 38 had benign lesions (43 lesions). The patients underwent conventional magnetic resonance (MR) plain scan, contrast-enhanced scan, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with different b values (b = 0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1 000, and 1 200 s/mm2) to determine the parameters of the double exponential model for intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM): fast diffusion coefficient Dfast, slow diffusion coefficient Dslow, and percentage of fast-diffusion constituent F value. The patients were divided into groups according to the blood supply to lesions on conventional MR plain scan and contrast-enhanced scan, and there were 47 lesions in abundant blood supply group and 49 in poor blood supply group. The data for analysis were Dfast, Dslow, and F values of benign/malignant lesion groups and abundant/poor blood supply groups. The independent samples t-test was used for statistical analysis; the independent samples non-parametric test Mann-Whitney U test was used for the comparison of F value; the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the value of above parameters in the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions and blood supply evaluation. Results: Compared with the malignant lesion group, the benign lesion group had significantly higher Dslow, and F values (P< 0.001 orP= 0.001) and a higher Dfast value (P= 0.053). Compared with the poor blood supply group, the abundant blood supply group had significantly higher Dfast and F values (P< 0.001 orP= 0.001) and a higher Dslow value (P= 0.185). According to the ROC curve, the cut-off values of Dslow, Dfast, and F values in the diagnosis of benign/malignant hepatic lesions and evaluation of abundant/poor blood supply were 1.18×10-3mm2/s, 27.20×10-3mm2/s, 20.25%, 1.17×10-3mm2/s, 20.30×10-3mm2/s, and 17.80%, respectively, with sensitivities, specificities, accuracy, and areas under the ROC curve of 90.69%/92.45%/91.66%/0.938, 46.51%/73.58%/61.45%/0.589, 74.41%/50.94%/62.50%/0.653, 59.57%/57.14%/58.33%/0.559, 55.32%/63.26%/59.37%/0.618, and 93.61%/89.79%/90.62%/0.961, respectively. Conclusion: The parameter of the double exponential model for IVIM, Dslow value, has a certain value in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant hepatic lesions, and F value can show blood perfusion in benign and malignant hepatic lesions without the need for contrast-enhanced scan, which provides a reference for the qualitative diagnosis of liver tumor.

Initial study on correlation between MR diffusion imaging and pathological results in patients with liver fibrosis

[Value of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Hepatic Lesions and Blood Perfusion Evaluation].

Diffusion-weighted Imaging and Variable Flip Angle T1 Mapping: a Supplement for Image-Guided Biopsy in Follow-Up Analysis of Liver Fibrosis

Comparative Study on Clinical and Pathological Changes of Liver Fibrosis with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

Staging Liver Fibrosis with DWI: is There an Added Value for Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging?

Diagnostic Value of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Assessing Liver Fibrosis

Assessment of Liver Fibrosis Using Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

[Functional MR Study of Hepatic Fibrosis].

Staging liver fibrosis with various diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging models

Type I Errors in Whole Brain Voxel-Wise Analyses

A Combined Use of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI Parameters Can Differentiate Early-Stage Hepatitis-b Fibrotic Livers from Healthy Livers

Recent advances in molecular magnetic resonance imaging of liver fibrosis.

Assessment of Chronic Hepatitis and Fibrosis: Comparison of MR Elastography and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.

Assessment of Liver Fibrosis by Variable Flip Angle T-1 Mapping at 3.0T

Aassessment of diffusion-weighted imaging in staging liver ifbrosis in rabbits

Intravoxel incoherent motion assessment of liver fibrosis staging in MASLD

Histogram Analysis of Diffusion Kurtosis Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Diagnosis of Hepatic Fibrosis

The Roles of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Parameters in Preoperative Evaluation of Pathological Grades and Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Assessing Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B Using MR Extracellular Volume Measurements: Comparison with Serum Fibrosis Indices

Effect of Ethanol on Erythrocyte Acetylcholinesterase Activity

Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging versus Conventional Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Distinguishing Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Benign Hepatic Nodules