Impact of Different Invasive and Non-invasive Sequential Ventilation Switching Time on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients Complicated with and Respiratory Failure: a Comparative Study

Ying-xin SUN,Chun-ling DU,Lei ZHOU,Xiao-lian SONG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-5971.2017.11.014
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the impact of different invasive and non-invasive sequential ventilation switching time on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients complicated with and respiratory failure.Methods A total of 84 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients complicated with and respiratory failure were selected in the Qingpu Branch of Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University from October 2014 to October 2016,all of them received mechanical ventilation and they were divided into A group (n =34),B group (n =25) and C group (n =25) according to mechanical ventilation methods.Patients of A group received invasive mechanical ventilation and conventional ventilator weaning and extubation,patients of B group received invasive and non-invasive sequential mechanical ventilation and take Pulmonary Infection Control Window as the switching time,patients of C group received invasive and non-invasive sequential mechanical ventilation and take GCS score equal or over 9 keeping for 2 hours as the switching time,ventilator weaning standard in B group and C group was same.Heart rate,MAP and arterial blood-gas analysis results before mechanical ventilation and at ventilator weaning,therapeutic conditions,ventilator weaning success rate,fatality rate and incidence of complications during the treatment were compared among the three groups.Results No statistically significant differences of heart rate,MAP,PaO2,PaCO2 or pH was found among the three groups before mechanical ventilation or at ventilator weaning (P > 0.05).Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation,total duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stays in B group and C group were statistically significantly shorter than those in A group,hospital fees in B group and C group was statistically significantly less than that in A group,respectively (P < 0.05);no statistically significant differences of duration of invasive mechanical ventilation or ICU stays was found between B group and C group (P > 0.05),total duration of mechanical ventilation in C group was statistically significantly shorter than that in B group,meanwhile hospital fees in C group was statistically significantly less than that in B group (P < 0.05).No statistically significant differences of ventilator weaning success rate or fatality rate was found among the three groups (P > 0.05).During the treatment,incidence of complications in B group and C group was statistically significantly lower than that in A group,respectively (P < 0.05),while no statistically significant differences of incidence of complications was found between B group and C group (P > 0.05).Conclusion In the invasive and non-invasive sequential mechanical ventilation in treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients complicated with and respiratory failure,taking Pulmonary Infection Control Window as the switching time has similar ventilator weaning success rate,fatality rate and safety with taking GCS score equal or over 9 keeping for 2 hours as the switching time,but the latter can more effectively shorten the total duration of mechanical ventilation and cut down the hospital fees.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?