How to Improve the Quality of Animal Experimental System Evaluation--A Comparative Study Based on Animal Experiment System Evaluation and Clinical Trial System Evaluation

Xuliang Liao,Yanbiao Jiang,Huan Wang,Mengna Zhao,Min Zhu,Xinyu Liu,Zhizhong Shang,Anhu Wu,Hexiang Wei,Jiale Tian,Hongyan Yang,Ruixing Zhang,Xingchen Guo,Lei Ren,Bin Ma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-4055.2019.05.04

2019-01-01

Abstract:Objective To comprehensive comparative analysis of animal experimental system evaluation and clinical trial system evaluation in terms of research characteristics, methods and report quality, etc., to provide reference for the future development and implementation of animal experimental system evaluation. Methods We searched the PubMed database. For systematic review of clinical trials data, time is limited to Oct. 2016. For systematic review of animal studies data, time is limited from Jan. 2016 to Dec. 2016. Five researchers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted basic characteristic and methodology characteristics of included studies. And then a descriptive analysis was conducted. Results Among the published systematic review of animal studies, less than 1/3 of the studies retrieved more than 3 databases, nearly half of the studies implemented language restrictions, no study implemented supplementary search, less than 20% of the studies reported screening flow chart, only Half of the systematic review of animal studies (51.8%) evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies and only one-third of the systematic review of animal studies evaluated the publication bias. Although most (73.2%) systematic review of animal studies implemented data synthesis (Meta-analysis), only 44.6% of systematic review of animal studies implemented heterogeneity analysis on the included studies. Conclusion Compared with systematic review of clinical trials, the number of systematic review of animal studies published is less and grows slowly. In order to promote quality improvement of systematic review of animal studies, it is necessary to further improve the methodology quality of systematic review of animal studies, and appropriate measures should be taken to propagate making of search strategy and assessment of risk of bias.