Comparison in evaluating myocardial viability by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography in patients with chronic total occlusion of coronary artery

Jianan Li,Wei Dong,Yi He,Lijun Zhang,Hongzhi Mi,Dongfeng Zhang,Rongchong Huang,Xiantao Song,Shuzheng LV
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-4055.2017.10.12
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare positron emission tomography (PET) and contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (ceCMR) in evaluating myocardial viability in patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) of coronary artery. Methods CTO patients (n=77) were given simultaneously ceCMR and PET examinations within 1 week. The imagines of ceCMR were analyzed by using 17-segmental method, and transmural extent of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) of ceCMR was scored and the results were showed as follows: 1 (0%), 2 (1%-25%), 3 (26%-50%), 4 (51%-75%) and 5 (76%-100%). The wall motion was scored and the results were showed as follows: 1 (normal), 2 (hypokinetic), 3 (akinetic) and 4 (dyskinetic). The myocardial viability was classified through blood perfusion and FDG uptake of PET. The myocardium having normal blood perfusion or increased FDG uptake (normal) and myocardium having decreased blood perfusion or normal or increased FDG uptake (mismatch) could be regarded as viable myocardium, and myocardium having decreased blood perfusion and decreased FDG uptake (match) could be regarded as nonviable myocardium.Results There was a significantly negative correlation between myocardial activity decided by PET and LGE of ceCMR (r=-0.657,P<0.001). With PET as gold standard, the sensitivity of ceCMR in detecting myocardial viability was 95.8%, specificity was 89.7%, positive predictive value was 98.1%, negative predictive value was 79.5%, and accuracy was 94.8%. The performance of ceCMR in detecting myocardial viability was analyzed by using receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC), and the results showed that area under curve (AUC) of ROC was 0.957. With LGE=50% as cut-off value, the sensitivity and specificity of ceCMR in differentiating viable myocardium and nonviable myocardium decided by PET were the highest. The consistency and correlation of ceCMR and PET were analyzed and the results showed that Kappa value was 0.795 (r=0.837,P<0.001)Conclusion With PET as gold standard, ceCMR has high consistency, sensitivity and specificity in detecting myocardial viability compared with PET in CTO patients. Thus, ceCMR can be used as an important method for detecting myocardial viability in CTO patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?