Effect of Cardiac Reverse Remodeling on Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillators
Pan Linfeng,Chen Kangyu,Yu Fei,Su Hao,Xu Jian,Zhu Hongjun,Shen Wei,Yang Dongmei,Yan Ji
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-6638.2019.03.011
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of cardiac reverse remodeling on ventricular arrhythmia (VA) after cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation.Methods The patients received CRT-D who had complete follow-up data in Anhui Provincial Hospital from June 2014 to June 2017 were included.Electrical reverse remodeling(ERR) was defined as baseline intrinsic QRS duration (iQRSd) shortening ≥ 10 ms 12 months after CRT-D implantation,and mechanical reverse remodeling(MRR) was defined as a decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume(LVESV) ≥ 15％ after at least 12 months after CRT-D implantation.According to the definition,patients were classified as ERR only group,MRR only group,ERR-MRR-group,and ERR+MRR+group.VA,implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks treatment,antitachycardia pacing therapy (ATP),and other indicator of the four groups were compared.Results A total of 222 patients enrolled in the study,ERR only group (n =31),MRR only group(n =62),non-responder (ERR-MRR-group,n =59),and ERR+MRR+group (n =70),and there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics among the four groups.Follow-up showed that compared with the ERR group,the ERR+MRR+ group had lesser VA per person [(0.34± 1.09) vs.(1.29±2.42),P=0.04] and lighter VA burden per person-year [(0.14±0.42) vs.(0.51±0.98),P=0.03],lesser ATP per person [(0.59 ± 1.71) vs.(1.74 ± 3.19),P =0.04],the difference was statistically significant.The shock per person [(0.13 ± 0.38) vs.(0.32 ± 0.60),P =0.06],shock burden per person-year [(0.06±0.22) vs.(0.16± 0.24),P =0.07] and the ATP burden per person-year [(0.26 ± 0.79) vs.(0.72 ±1.37),P =0.05] were not statistically significant.In addition,the VA burden per person-year [(0.51 ±0.98) vs.(1.34± 1.84),P=0.04] was statistically significant lighter in the ERR group than that in the nonERR group.While VA per person[(1.29±2.42) vs.(3.42±5.05),P=0.05],shock per person[(0.32±0.60) vs.(0.76±1.07),P=0.06],shock burden per person-year[(0.16±0.24) vs.(0.33±0.49),P=0.10],ATP per person [(1.74± 3.19) vs.(4.52± 6.89),P =0.07] and ATP burden per person-year[(0.72± 1.37) vs.(1.78±2.49),P=0.05] were not statistically significant.There were no significant differences in VA,VA burden,ATP,ATP burden,shock,shock burden between the MRR group and non-responder.Conclusion Only mechanical reverse remodeling can not reduce the VA burden.Electrical reverse remodeling can reduce the VA burden.Both electrical reverse remodeling and mechanical reverse remodeling can further reduce the burden.