Analysis of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence in Patients With or Without Pulmonary Vein Triggers During Primary Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Atrium Isolation

Min-yong JIANG,Hong-wu CHEN,Bing YANG,Wei-zhu JU,Feng-xiang ZHANG,Gang YANG,Kai GU,Ming-fang LI,Ke-jiang CAO,Ming-long CHEN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2016.11.012
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To explore the reason for atrial ifbrillation (AF) recurrence in patients with or without pulmonary vein (PV) triggers during primary circumferential PV atrium isolation. <br> Methods: A total of 181 patients with paroxysmal AF were enrolled including 135 male with the mean age of (55.0±11.4) years and mean medical history of (64.6±68.5) months. Circumferential PV atrium isolation was performed under the guidance of 3-D mapping system. Post-operative conventional programmed stimulation was performed and additional ablation was conducted at the same time if the patients combining supraventricular arrhythmia or non-PA triggers. According to operation records, the patients were divided into 2 groups: PV incurred AF group,n=61 and Non-PV incurred AF group,&nbsp;n=120. All patients received ECG, dynamic ECG before discharge and they were followed-up at (1-3) months and 6 months after operation. The patients with AF recurrence would receive the second ablation. <br> Results: All patients had successful PV isolation. In Non-PV incurred AF group, 12 patients had clear non-PV triggers, 1 located at the roof of left atrium and 11 originated from superior vena cava. Clinical information was similar between 2 groups. During (36.1±16.4) months follow-up period, AF recurrence rates were similar between 2 groups (22.9% vs 33.3%), P=0.15. During 2nd ablation, in Non-PV incurred AF group, 12 patients received re-PV isolation and superior vena cava trigger was found in 1 patient; in PV incurred AF group, 36 patients received re-PV isolation and 17 triggers were found in 16 patients including 2 originated from PV and 15 at outside of PV as 12 originated from superior vena cava, 2 from coronary sinus and 1 from septum. There were 15 patients with AF recurrence after the 2nd ablation and 2 of the received 3rd procedure, the triggers located at left atrial septum and coronary sinus respectively; 1 patient received 4th ablation and the trigger located at the rear wall of left atrium. After 2nd ablation, the success rate in PV incurred AF group was higher than Non-PV incurred AF group (95.1% vs 84.1%),P=0.03; while the ratio of non-PV triggers was lower in PV incurred AF group (1.98% vs 22.5%),P<0.001. <br> Conclusion: In patients with clear PV triggers, the major cause of AF recurrence was the recovered conduction from LA to PV; in patients without clear PV triggers, the major cause of AF recurrence was non-PV triggers and they usually need additional ablation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?