Comparison of catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drug therapy for atrial fibrillation

Xinna Xu,Ping Zhang,Xuebin Li,Ding Li,Long Wang,Cuncao Wu,Jiangbo Duan,Feng Ze,Fei Guo,Jihong Guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-5410.2015.02.004
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical efficacy between catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation ( AF). Methods Six hundred and forty-four patients with atrial fibrillation were enrolled. The basic data were collected,and the patients were matched and grouped in two with different treatment strategies according to propensity score method (257 patients for each). The follow-up period was 18 months. The effectiveness of catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drug therapy was compared via the Cox proportional hazards model. The primary endpoint was recurrence of atrial fibrillation. The secondary endpoints were hospitalization rate due to aggravating heart failure, the incidence of thromboembolism, the cumulative survival rate and the improvement of life quality. Results 1. The recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation was lower in catheter ablation group than in antiarrhythmic drug group (HR:3. 12, 95% CI:1. 93 - 5. 03,P < 0. 01) . 2. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the hospitalization rate due to heart failure (HR:1. 14,95% CI:0. 67 - 1. 94,P = 0. 34). 3. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of thromboembolism event (HR:0. 98,&nbsp;95% CI:0. 44 - 2. 20,P = 0. 38) . 4. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the cumulative survival rate ( HR: 1. 05, 95% CI: 0. 33 - 3. 32, P = 0. 73 ) . 5. There was no significant improvement in quality of life in antiarrhythmic drug group, whereas there was significant improvement of mental health score in catheter ablation group (P = 0. 04 for the 3rd month, P = 0. 04 for the 12th month). Conclusions Compared with the antiarrhythmic drug group, there is lower recurrence of atrial fibrillation in the catheter ablation group, and better mental quality as well. However, there is no significant difference of hospitalization rate due to heart failure, thromboembolism event and cumulative survival rate between the two groups.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?