Comparison of Methods for Establishing Mouse Myocardial Ischemia/reperfusion Model and Assessing Myocardial Infarct Size

孟增慧,杨承志,田爱炬,吕志珍,张幼怡,高炜,李子健,郭丽君
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-5410.2014.02.012
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective The study aims to establish an efficient mouse model of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion and the assessment of myocardial infarct size. Methods Forty male BAB/c mice were equally divided into the classic method group and the new method group. In the classic method group, reperfusion was achieved by reopening the chest and releasing the ligation, while in the new method group reperfusion was achieved by releasing the slipknot without opening the chest for the second time. Infarct area (IA), area at risk (AAR) and left ventricular (LV) area was quantitatively evaluated by Evans blue-TTC staining. Two measurements were applied to analyze the data. Compared to the classic measurement, IA, AAR and LV areas on each section were multiplied by the percentage of weight of the section and then totaled from all sections in new measurement. Results The myocardial infarction size (IA/AAR) was not significantly different between classic and new method group (classic measurement: classic method group 44.43%±2.28% new method group 44.24%±1.68%, P=0.96; new measurement: classic method group 51.74%±2.26% new method group 54.51%±1.14%, P=0.23). Higher survival rate, less anesthetic dosage and reduced analepsia time were observed in the new method group in comparison with the classic method group (all P<0.05). In addition, the standard deviation of both AAR/LV and IA/AAR were lower in the new measurement group. Conclusions The new method for establishing myocardial ischemia/reperfusion mouse model is more efficient compared with the classic method. Furthermore the new measurement is more accurate for the assessment of myocardial infarct size than the classic measurement. Key words: Myocardial ischemia; Reperfusion injury; Mice; Models, animal; Infarct size
What problem does this paper attempt to address?