Abstract:Objective:To explore the value of detachable string-magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (DS-MCE) in the evaluation of post-endoscopic treatment of liver cirrhosis patients with gastroesophageal varices during follow-up, and conventional electronic esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was used as the gold standard.Methods:From July 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021, 50 follow-up patients with gastroesophageal varices due to liver cirrhosis and had a past medical history of endoscopic treatment in Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine were selected. DS-MCE and EGD were performed in turn. The 2 endoscopic examination methods were compared and analyzed in the assessment of detecting gastroesophageal varices, grading of diameter of esophageal varices and classification of bleeding risk factors (including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value), diagnosis of portal hypertensive gastropathy and its severity, and the patients′ satisfaction (pre-procedural perceptual and post-procedural satisfaction). Kruskal-Wallis test and Kappa test were used for statistical analysis.Results:The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of DS-MCE in the diagnosis of esophageal varices were 100.0% (43/43), 85.7%(6/7), 97.7% (43/44) and 100.0%(6/6), respectively.The accuracy of DS-MCE in evaluating the grading of esophageal varices was 86.0% (43/50), with good consistency of EGD, and the Kappa value was 0.797 ( P<0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of DS-MCE in the diagnosis of esophageal varices with bleeding risk factors were 94.4% (34/36), 100.0%(14/14), 100.0% (34/34) and 87.5%(14/16), respectively. The accuracy of DS-MCE in evaluating esophageal varices with bleeding risk factors was 94.0% (47/50), with good consistency of EGD, and the Kappa value was 0.862 ( P<0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of DS-MCE in the diagnosis of gastric varices were 85.7% (18/21), 93.1% (27/29), 90.0% (18/20) and 90.0% (27/30), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of DS-MCE in the diagnosis of portal hypertensive gastropathy were all 100.0% (50/50). The consistency of DS-MCE and EGD in the severity grading of portal hypertensive gastropathy was good, the Kappa value was 0.962 ( P<0.001). The results of pre-procedural perceptual analysis showed that patients′ psychological tension before examination and expected pain before examination of DS-MCE were better than those of EGD ( H=16.04 and 23.74, both P<0.001). The results of satisfactory analysis after examination indicated that DS-MCE was better than EGD in the degree of difficulty in swallowing, pain and discomfort during examination, pain and discomfort after examination, comfort degree during examination, convenience of the procedure and willingness of receiving such examination again as gastric examination method ( H=17.28, 30.88, 44.68, 34.66, 48.05, 22.74, 13.03 and 17.19, all P<0.001). Conclusions:With EGD as the gold standard, DS-MCE can accurately evaluate gastroesophageal varices and portal hypertensive gastroenteropathy after endoscopic treatment in patients with liver cirrhosis and gastroesophageal varices, and it is a safe and comfortable method. DS-MCE can be an efficient alternative method in endoscopic follow-up of such patients.

A comparative study of multi-slice spiral CT portography and B-mode ultrasonography in patients with cirrhosis for predicting esophageal variceal bleeding

Prediction of esophageal variceal bleeding with 64-slice spiral CT portography in cirrhotic patients

Evaluation of esophagogastric variceal bleeding using multi-slice CT portal venography

Anlysis of cirrhotic grade and esophageal variceal bleeding with muti-slice CT portography

Multi-Slice Spiral Computed Tomography Portography Is Valuable To Predict Esophageal Variceal Bleeding And Hepatic Encephalopathy In Patients With Cirrhosis

A study of applications of spectral CT in predicting the risk of variceal bleeding of liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension_

A comparative study of multi-detector CT portography versus endoscopy in evaluation of gastro-esophageal varices in portal hypertension patients

Predicting Risk of Esophageal Variceal Bleeding Caused by Liver Cirrhosis with Spectral CT Imaging in Portal Hypertension Patients

Value of Multislice Spiral CT in Detecting and Grading of Esophageal Varices in Cirrhotic Patients

Color Doppler ultrasound predicting variceal hemorrhage in patients with liver cirrhosis

MSCT predict esophageal varietals bleeding by easements of esophageal variceal diameter on patients with portal hypertension

Esophageal varices bleeding with liver cirrhosis studied with Doppler ultrasonography

[Evaluation of Esophageal Varices and Predicting the Risk of Esophageal Varices Bleeding with Multi-Detector CT in Patients with Portal Hypertension].

Portal vein computed tomography imaging characteristics and their relationship with bleeding risk in patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing interventional therapy

CT Prediction of the Uppper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Caused by Portal Hypertension with Cirrhosis of Liver

The therapeutic value of non-invasive indicators in B ultrasonography on predicting esophageal varices and esophageal variceal bleeding

A comparative study on the diagnosis of esophageal and gastric varices between multislice spiral CT portography and endoscopy

Gastric varices in patients with portal hypertension: evaluation with multidetector row CT.

Analysis of noninvasive predictive indices of esophageal varices in patients with posthepatitic cirrhosis

Assessment of Portal Vein Embolism in the Liver Transplant Candidates:Comparison of Ultrasound and Spiral CT Portography

Application of detachable string-magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy in the evaluation of post-endoscopic treatment of 50 liver cirrhosis patients with esophagogastric varices during follow-up