The Application of AngioguardTM Distal Protection Device in the Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
王乐丰,杨新春,佟子川,徐立,王红石,邹阳春,葛永贵,王立中,李惟铭,连勇,栾与英,吴兆苏,张维君,周旭
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2003.03.003
2003-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the feasibility of Angioguard TM DPD during emergency PCI in the patients with acute STEMI. Methods From July 2002 to Dec. 2002, 40 acute STEMI patients who received primary coronary intervention were included into this study. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether Angioguard TM DPD was attempted during emergency PCI. The basic clinical characteristics, angiographic results, and follow-up data before discharge were compared. TIMI grade, TIMI Frame Count and myocardial blush grade were performed in all cases after emergency PCI. Results Success was achieved in 19 patients (19/21, 90.4%) by Angioguard TM DPD with varies extent of material from the basket. There was no significant difference between the two groups in basic clinical characteristics, angiogram before PCI (P0.05) and TIMI 3 flows achieved in IRAs after PCI (100% vs 84%, P=0.23). Less distal embolizations (5.2% vs 36.8%, P=0.042), Better TIMI frame count (19.9±5.7 vs 30.3±9.6, P0.001) and better percentage of blush grade 3 of IRAs (73.7% vs 31.6%, P=0.022) were achieved in DPD group. Follow-up date before discharge showed there were lower peak serum CK levels, higher LVEF and faster ST segment resolution in the Angioguard TM group after PCI (P0.05). There was no MACE in both groups. Conclusion Application of Angioguard TM DPD during emergency PCI in some patients with acute STEMI was safe and effective which could improve distal coronary perfusion and left ventricular function. TIMI Frame Count and myocardial Blush grade in evaluation of distal myocardial blood perfusion during emergency PCI was superior to that of TIMI grade in this study.