Meta analysis of CHA2DS2-VASc contributing to standardization management of the prophylactic anticoagulation therapy of TE and/or stroke in AF patients

Wengen ZHU,Qinmei XIONG,Kui HONG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2015.03.008
2015-01-01
Journal of Clinical Cardiology
Abstract:Objective:To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the predictive abilities of CHA2DS2-VASc in stroke and systemic thromboembolism (TE) risk stratification of atrial fibrilltion (AF) patients with and without anticoagulation therapy.Method:The data were systematically retrieved by searching the Cochrane Library,PubMed and Embase databases to identify relevant cohort studies published in English reporting the diagnostic performance between CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc.Review Manager 5.2 software were used to perform the statistical analyses.The risk ratios (RRs) with the 95% CI were presented and pooled for comparative analysis of the occurrence of TE and/or stroke between CHA2DS2-VASc<2 and CHA2DS2-VASc≥2,also considering the presence or absence of anticoagulation therapy.Result:Twelve cohort studies were identified in the analysis.Of these included studies,7 of the included studies reported TE outcomes,and 5 studies included a record of stroke events.With regard to the occurrence of outcomes individually,patients with CHA2 DS2-VASc scores ≥2 showed a greater risk for stroke (RR 5.31,CI:3.69~7.62;P<0.01) and TE (RR 5.94,CI:5.48~6.43;P<0.01) (Pdiff=0.55),regardless of the presence or absence of anticoagulation therapy (RR 5.43,CI:4.92~6.00;P<0.01 and RR 5.92,CI:5.26~6.67;P<0.01,respectively) (Pdiff =0.57).The average ratio of endpoint events in the low-risk group of CHA2DS2-VASc was less than CHADS2 (0.54% vs 1.40%,P<0.05).The average proportion of the high-risk group of CHA2DS2-VASc was greater than CHADS2 (81.0% vs 46.0%,P<0.05).Conclusion:Our results showed better diagnostic performance for CHA2DS2-VASc over CHADS2 for the distribution of greater numbers of patients and a greater incidence of endpoints events into the high-risk stratification,as well as the identification of patients with atrial fibrillation who are at substantial risk of endpoint events with or without optimal anticoagulant therapy.It indicates that the prophylactic anticoagulation treatment of TE and/or stroke in patients with AF should be evaluated systematically and standardized implementation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?