Abstract:Background The differentiation and diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and pre-excited tachycardia (PXT) remains a challenging task, especially when typical AV dissociation is not present. The purpose of this article is to study the feasibility of a new theoretical algorithm for identifying ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and pre-excited arrhythmias (PA) rhythms (which can be used to distinguish VT from PXT, etc.). Method This study involved the deduction of a new algorithm by combining knowledge of cardiac anatomy, vectorcardiography, and cardiac electrophysiology. The new algorithm evaluated the diagnostic value through intracardiac electrophysiology in 205 cases of VA and PA. The new algorithm diagnoses VA based on the following 4-step process: 1. The QRS complex in leads II, III, and aVF shows a unidirectional R wave, and lead aVR shows a QS pattern. 2. S waves are predominant in two or more of leads I, aVF, and V6. 3. Lead V2 shows ≥3 phase waves or returning branch notching (note: returning branch refers to the band of QRS complexes returning to the baseline). 4. Lead V5 shows a negative wave in the initial portion or returning branch notching. If none of these criteria are met, the diagnosis is PA. The diagnostic value of the new algorithm is compared with the Steurer algorithm and the Vereckei algorithm (diagnosed based on the QRS waveform characteristics of the two algorithms during electrophysiological verification, excluding the diagnosis of atrioventricular dissociation). Results The new algorithm showed significant advantages in terms of AUC value (0.83 vs. 0.61 vs. 0.57), sensitivity (83.6 % vs. 23.3 % vs. 24.8 %), and accuracy (82.9 % vs. 48.3 % vs. 46.3 %) compared to the Steurer algorithm and Vereckei algorithm based on QRS waveform characteristics for diagnosing VA (137 cases) and PA (68 cases). This indicates that the new algorithm is more accurate in identifying idiopathic VA. While there was a significant difference in specificity between the New algorithm and Steurer algorithm (82.3 % vs. 98.5 %, p < 0.05), the difference with Vereckei algorithm (82.3 % vs. 89.7 %) was not significant.In the New algorithm, the sensitivity and specificity for each step are as follows: - Step 1: Sensitivity 34.3 %, Specificity 94.1 %. - Step 2: Sensitivity 24.1 %, Specificity 98.5 %. - Step 3: Sensitivity 18.3 %, Specificity 100 %. - Step 4: Sensitivity 6.6 %, Specificity 89.7 %. Step 1 had the highest AUC value, indicating the best overall diagnostic performance among all steps. Step 2 and Step 3 also performed well, while Step 4 had relatively poorer diagnostic performance. Conclusion The new algorithm is suitable for identifying the origin of VA and PA rhythms.

New algorithm using only lead AVR for differential diagnosis of wide QRS complex tachycardia

Vereckei and Brugada algorithm for differential diagnosis of wide QRS complex tachycardia

Study on the feasibility of distinguishing ventricular and pre-excited arrhythmia rhythms by a new algorithm

Value of Single Avr Lead in Differential Diagnosis of Ventricular Tachycardia in Children

Precordial transition and V2 transition ratio for distinguishing left from right ventricular outflow tract arrhythmia origin

Discrimination between ventricular tachycardia and wide‐QRS preexcited tachycardia

A machine learning approach to differentiate wide QRS tachycardia: distinguishing ventricular tachycardia from supraventricular tachycardia

A Four-Stepwise Electrocardiographic Algorithm for Differentiation of Ventricular Arrhythmias Originated from Left Ventricular Outflow Tract.

Comparative analysis of electrocardiographic imaging and ECG in predicting the origin of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias

Direct Comparison of Methods to Differentiate Wide Complex Tachycardias: Novel Automated Algorithms Versus Manual ECG Interpretation Approaches

Automatic Coordinate Prediction of the Exit of Ventricular Tachycardia from 12-Lead Electrocardiogram

Artificial intelligence in cardiology: a machine learning model for supraventricular tachycardia discrimination

[An intelligent model for classifying supraventricular tachycardia mechanisms based on 12-lead wearable electrocardiogram devices]

Electro-anatomically confirmed sites of origin of ventricular tachycardia and premature ventricular contractions and occurrence of R wave in lead aVR: A proof of concept study

Amplitude of QRS complex within initial 40 ms in V2 (V2QRSi40): Novel electrocardiographic criterion for predicting accurate localization of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmia origin

A Deep Learning-based Classification Algorithm for the Origin of Premature Ventricular Contractions.

A new approach of QRS complex detection based on matched filtering and triangle character analysis

Artificial Intelligence to Interpret Wide-Complex Tachycardia - Trust the Machine?

Automatic Detection of QRS Complexes Using Dual Channels Based on U-Net and Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory

Recognition of Premature Ventricular Contraction Beat from 12lead ECG Based on A Novel Detection Function of QRS Onset

The diagnostic value of rSr' complex in V1 lead during supraventricular tachycardia