Abstract:BACKGROUND: The liver is one of the most important organs in the human body, with functions such as detoxification, digestion, and blood coagulation. In terms of vascular anatomy, the liver is divided into the left and the right liver by the main portal vein, and there are three hepatic efferent veins (right, middle, and left) and two portal branches. Patients with impaired liver function have increased intrahepatic vascular resistance and splanchnic vasodilation, which may lead to an increase in the portal pressure gradient (PPG) and cause portal hypertension (PHT). In order to measure the increased pressure gradient of portal vein, the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) can be measured to reflect it in clinical practice. The accuracy of PPG measurements is directly related to patient prognosis.AIM: To analyze the correlation between HVPG of three hepatic veins and PPG in patients with PHT.METHODS: From January 2017 to December 2019, 102 patients with PHT who met the inclusion criteria were evaluated during the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure and analyzed.RESULTS: The mean HVPG of the middle hepatic vein was 17.47 ± 10.25 mmHg, and the mean HVPG of the right and left hepatic veins was 16.34 ± 7.60 and 16.52 ± 8.15 mmHg, respectively. The average PPG was 26.03 ± 9.24 mmHg. The correlation coefficient and coefficient of determination of the right hepatic vein, middle hepatic vein, and left hepatic vein were 0.15 and 0.02 (P = 0.164); 0.25 and 0.05 (P = 0.013); and 0.14 and 0.02 (P = 0.013), respectively. The mean wedged hepatic vein/venous pressure (WHVP) of the middle and left hepatic veins was similar at 29.71 ± 12.48 and 29.1 ± 10.91 mmHg, respectively, and the mean WHVP of the right hepatic vein was slightly lower at 28.01 ± 8.95 mmHg. The mean portal vein pressure was 34.11 ± 8.56 mmHg. The correlation coefficient and coefficient of determination of the right hepatic vein, middle hepatic vein, and left hepatic vein were 0.26 and 0.07 (P = 0.009); 0.38 and 0.15 (P < 0.001); and 0.26 and 0.07 (P = 0.008), respectively. The average free hepatic venous pressure (FHVP) of the right hepatic vein was lowest at 11.67 ± 5.34 mmHg, and the average FHVP of the middle and left hepatic veins was slightly higher at 12.19 ± 4.88 and 11.67 ± 5.34 mmHg, respectively. The average inferior vena cava pressure was 8.27 ± 4.04 mmHg. The correlation coefficient and coefficient of determination of the right hepatic vein, middle hepatic vein, and left hepatic vein were 0.30 and 0.09 (P = 0.002); 0.18 and 0.03 (P = 0.078); and 0.16 and 0.03 (P = 0.111), respectively.CONCLUSION: Measurement of the middle hepatic vein HVPG could better represent PPG. Considering the high success rate of clinical measurement of the right hepatic vein, it can be the second choice.

Analysis on influential factors of hepatic venous pressure gradient after esophagogastric variceal bleeding in liver cirrhosis

Portal Vein Thrombosis Can Aggravate Esophageal Variceal Bleeding After Endoscopic Variceal Ligation

Hepatic venous pressure gradient affects the efficacy of endoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal varices in hepatitis B cirrhosis

Correlation between hepatic venous pressure gradient and clinic features in patients with liver cirrhosis

Influence of follow-up treatment compliance on prognosis after endoscopic gastroesophageal varices treatment

Prevention for Rebleeding of Esophageal Varices under the Guidance of Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient

Risk Factors for Predicting Early Variceal Rebleeding after Endoscopic Variceal Ligation

Correlation of HVPG Level with CTP Score, MELD Score, Ascites, Size of Varices, and Etiology in Cirrhotic Patients

The Presence of Ascites Affects the Predictive Value of HVPG on Early Rebleeding in Patients with Cirrhosis

Hepatic venous pressure gradient and rebleeding risk of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis after variceal bleeding

Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient Predicts Further Decompensation in Cirrhosis Patients with Acute Esophageal Variceal Bleeding

Correlation between hepatic venous pressure gradient and portal venous pressure gradient in hepatitis B cirrhosis with different hepatic veins anatomy

Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) predicts liver failure after transjugular intrahepatic portal shunt: a retrospective cohort study

Persistent varices in cured patients: Understanding the role of hepatic venous pressure gradient

Prognostic Factors of Patients with Acute Gastroesophageal Variceal Bleeding Caused by Liver Cirrhosis

Correlation of pressure gradient in three hepatic veins with portal pressure gradient

Effects of Extremely High Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient on Short-Term Prognosis of Endoscopic Therapy in Secondary Prophylaxis for Patients with Gastroesophageal Varices

The impact of restrictive blood transfusion on the safety of patients with esophageal varices after endoscopic variceal ligation: A single-center retrospective study

Impact of catheter tip to hepatic vein ostium distance on the validity and prognostication of hepatic venous pressure gradient in cirrhosis

Characteristics of peptic ulcer bleeding in cirrhotic patients with esophageal and gastric varices

Impact of Portal Vein Thrombosis on Endoscopic Variceal Band Ligation in Liver Cirrhosis