Analysis on Clinical,and Pathological and Immunological Features of 147 Cases with Lupus Nephritis

邹玉蓉,张萍,李贵森,洪大情,汪伟,王莉
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-587X.2014.08.011
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To explore the clinical、pathological and immunological features with different pathological types of lu-pus nephritis(LN)patients. Methods:The clinical、pathological and immunological material of 147 cases with LN were analyzed ret-rospectively and was analyzed by statistical method. Results:(1)The most common clinical symptoms of LN included was edema 73 cases(49. 7% ),arthralgia 66cases(44. 9% )and rash 65 cases(44. 2% ). Compared to other class LN,class Ⅲ had higher inci-dence of edema and hair loss,the difference was statistically significant(P ﹤ 0. 05);(2)Compared to class Ⅴ,the class Ⅳ had more severely changed on the average Crea,WBC,HGB,PLT ,and moer lower complement levels,more higher MAPmean arterial pres-sure,the difference was statistically significant(P ﹤ 0. 05);Compared to class Ⅲ and Ⅳ,the averge cholesteroland triglycerides lev-els of classⅤ was significantly higher(P ﹤ 0. 05),24 h urinary protein excretion of classⅤ + Ⅲ was more higher(P ﹤ 0. 05);(3) The positive rates of autoantibodies in LN patients were relatively high level on ANA 126 cases(85. 7% ),anti - dsDNA 90 cases (61. 2% ),anti - SSA 89 cases(60. 5% );compared with classⅢ and classⅣ,class Ⅴ + Ⅲ and class Ⅴ + Ⅳ anti - U1RNP posi-tive rates were significantly higher,Respectively was 10 cases(90. 9% )and 11 cases(68. 7% ),the difference was statistically sig-nificant(P ﹤ 0. 05). Conclusion:LN class Ⅳ was the most common type in this study;The LN with different pathological class has some of the characteristics of clinical,laboratory and immunological features;Edema is the most common clinical symptoms on LN;LN Complex Ⅴ has more higher anti - U1RNP positive rates than others. We should pay attention to the clinical,immunological char-acteristics of complex class Ⅴ,It may indicate different pathogenesis,and guide clinical diagnosis and treatment,judge prognosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?