Safety and efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus early sequential percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of large primary liver cancer with hepatitis B cirrhosis:a single-center experience

Wei SUN,Xiao-yan DING,Jing-long CHEN,Wen-dong LI,Xiao-di GUO,Xiang-yi WANG,Li Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-7380.2014.04.10
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To assess the safety and efifcacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus early squential percutaneous CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in large primary liver cancer (PLC) with hepatitis B cirrhosis. Methods From October 2010 to September 2013, PLC with hepatitis B cirrhosis patients (at least one tumor≥5 cm in diameter) received lipiodol-based TACE on D1. Then CT-guided RFA was done on D5 ± 2. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP). The secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results Total of 45 patients were divided into group A (Child-Pugh A, 25 cases) and group B (Child-Pugh B, 20 cases). The median age of the cohort was 56 years (39-78 years). Median follow-up time was 746 days (90-1410 days). TACE plus RFA treatment-related adverse events were mainly mild to moderate, with 40 cases of ALT elevation (88.9%), 39 cases of fever (86.7%), 38 cases of AST elevation (84.4%). The two groups had similar treatment-emergent safety proifles. The differences in TTP and ORR between two groups were statistically insigniifcant (P>0.05). The median OS time of group A was longer than that of group B, 532 and 302 days, respectively, but no signiifcant difference was found (P=0.211). Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor response was identiifed as an independent favorable prognostic factor for TTP (P = 0.011). However, cases with HBeAg positive had increased risk of disease progression, HR=2.741 (P=0.023). conclusions TACE plus early sequential RFA combined hepatitis B cirrhosis of the liver is safe and effective treatment of liver cancer. No signiifcant differences in liver damage caused by sequential treatment was demonstrated based on different baseline liver function. The short-term curative effect is an important factor to determine the prognostic of patients with large liver cancer.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?