Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Hong-jia LU,Ming-long CHEN,Bing YANG,Wei-zhu JU,Hong-wu CHEN,Feng-xiang ZHANG,Xiao-feng HOU,Chun CHEN,Jian-gang ZOU,Qi-jun SHAN,Ke-jiang CAO
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-6638.2009.05.008
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate radiofrcquency catheter ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients as well as its feasibility, safety and efficacy. Methods Data from patients with AF and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation (RF-CA) were retrospectively analyzed. All cases underwent circumferential pulmonary vein ablation to reach the endpoint of electrical isolation guided by three dimensional mapping system (Carto or EnSite-NavX). Patients with persistent AF also accepted additional complex fractionated atrial electrograms ablation and linear ablation in the left atrium. After the procedure, all antiarrhythmic drugs were continued in the first three months. Pa-tients were followed with 24-hour Hoher monitoring at 1,3, and 6 months after the procedure and 12-lead elec-trogram was recorded during palpitation symptoms occurred. Results Six cases were with paroxysmal AF and the other 5 were persistent (mean age 52±17 years,2 female). One patient died from acute heart failure due to atrial tachycardia attacked four weeks after the procedure. After a mean follow-up of (14±10) months, 4 of the remaining 10 patients experienced recurrence of AF, 2 of them were referred for the second catheter ablation procedure. By the end of follow-up, 7 cases were in sinus rhythm (64%). No major periprocedural com-plication occurred. There were no significant difference in left atrium diameter and left ventricle ejection fraction [(46±4)mm vs (46±4) mm,0.64±0.05 vs 0.66±0.04, P> 0.05] before and after the procedure. Whereas the heart function showed marked improvement (2.0±0.7 vs 1.2±0.4, P<0. 05, the New York Heart Asso-ciation class) in patients who maintained sinus rhythm. Conclusion RFCA treatment was safe and effective for AF in the setting of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and those who have good maintenance of sinus rhythm will ex-perience a marked improvement in heart function.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?