Abstract:HomeCirculation: Arrhythmia and ElectrophysiologyVol. 7, No. 5Intramural Outflow Tract Ventricular Tachycardia Free AccessResearch ArticlePDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessResearch ArticlePDF/EPUBIntramural Outflow Tract Ventricular TachycardiaAnatomy, Mapping, and Ablation Hongwu Chen, MD, Michael Shehata, MD, Charles Swerdlow, MD, Wei Ma, MD, Gang Xu, MD, Bing Yang, MD, Minglong Chen, MD and Xunzhang Wang, MD Hongwu ChenHongwu Chen From the Heart Rhythm Center, The Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (M.S., S.C., W.M., G.X., X.W.); and Division of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China (H.C., B.Y., M.C.). , Michael ShehataMichael Shehata From the Heart Rhythm Center, The Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (M.S., S.C., W.M., G.X., X.W.); and Division of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China (H.C., B.Y., M.C.). , Charles SwerdlowCharles Swerdlow From the Heart Rhythm Center, The Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (M.S., S.C., W.M., G.X., X.W.); and Division of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China (H.C., B.Y., M.C.). , Wei MaWei Ma From the Heart Rhythm Center, The Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (M.S., S.C., W.M., G.X., X.W.); and Division of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China (H.C., B.Y., M.C.). , Gang XuGang Xu From the Heart Rhythm Center, The Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (M.S., S.C., W.M., G.X., X.W.); and Division of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China (H.C., B.Y., M.C.). , Bing YangBing Yang From the Heart Rhythm Center, The Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (M.S., S.C., W.M., G.X., X.W.); and Division of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China (H.C., B.Y., M.C.). , Minglong ChenMinglong Chen From the Heart Rhythm Center, The Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (M.S., S.C., W.M., G.X., X.W.); and Division of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China (H.C., B.Y., M.C.). and Xunzhang WangXunzhang Wang From the Heart Rhythm Center, The Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (M.S., S.C., W.M., G.X., X.W.); and Division of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China (H.C., B.Y., M.C.). Originally published1 Oct 2014https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.114.001744Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2014;7:978–981Idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT) originating from the outflow tract has been treated with a relatively high success rate by radiofrequency catheter ablation. However, a small percentage of failure in these patients may be because of an inaccessible site of origin from an intramural location. The region of the interventricular septum between the right (RVOT) and left ventricular outflow tracts (LVOT) can be mapped by using thinner multielectrode catheters advanced via the septal perforating venous tributaries of the great cardiac vein (GCV).1,2 The following case series is a description of these intramural VTs and the anatomic analysis in this region.See Editor's Perspective p 982Case ReportCase 1A 56-year-old man with a history of high-burden premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) that were refractory to medical therapy underwent catheter ablation. The morphology of the PVC by ECG showed a rS wave with S wave notch at lead I and a rS wave in V1 (Figure 1A). The earliest ventricular activation timing at the RVOT was −19 ms. Mapping of the GCV and vein tributaries was then performed using a 3.5-mm irrigated ablation catheter guided by venography (Figure 1B). The GCV and lateral veins of the GCV were mapped with no optimal early ventricular activation located. However, the earliest activation was located at a septal perforating branch (SPB) vein of the GCV with a timing of −39 ms. Pace mapping at the target area completely matched with the clinical PVC. Ablation was performed at the earliest SPB vein site using an irrigated catheter with 15 W and an infusion rate of 17 mL/min with impedance range of 150 to 180 Ohms (Figure 1C), with complete elimination of PVCs during radiofrequency delivery. After the ablation procedure, there were no recurrent PVCs during a 2-year follow-up period.Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 1. A, Twelve-lead ECG of the premature ventricular contraction in a bigeminal pattern with an rS pattern in lead V1 and rS wave with S wave notch in lead I. B, Top panels demonstrate venography in left anterior oblique (LAO) and right anterior oblique (RAO) projections with an array mapping balloon in the right ventricular outflow tract. Bottom panels demonstrate positioning of a 3.5-mm irrigated ablation catheter electrode in the septal perforating branch (SPB) vein and 4 mm ablation electrode in the anterior aspect of right ventricular outflow tract in LAO and RAO projections. C, Intracardiac electrograms from mapping of the SPB vein with the ablation catheter electrode at the successful target site. AIV indicates anterior interventricular vein; and LLB, left lateral branch.Case 2A 46-year-old woman with a history of newly diagnosed cardiomyopathy with a very high burden of ventricular ectopy (70% of all QRS complexes) on a 24-hour Holter monitor that was refractory to medical therapy presented to our center. Twelve-lead ECG showed a QS pattern in lead I and a rS with relatively narrow QRS pattern in lead V1 (Figure 2A). Mapping of the RVOT, GCV including SPB veins, as well as LVOT and aortic cusps was performed. The early site of ventricular activation in the RVOT was slightly later than that mapped to the SPB vein (−38 ms; Figure 2C). Initially, ablation was performed at the RVOT site using a 4-mm irrigated electrode with 40 W and only transient suppression of PVCs (Figure 2B, middle panel). Subsequently, ablation was performed within the SPB vein using a 4-mm nonirrigated electrode with 5 W at 80°C with an impedance of 180 Ohms, which resulted in complete elimination of PVCs. The LV ejection fraction was noted to have completely recovered at 3-month follow-up, and the patient remained free of PVCs during a 2-year follow-up period.Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 2. A, Twelve-lead ECG demonstrates premature ventricular contractions with a rS and relatively narrow QRS in V1 and QS wave in lead I. B, Coronary arteriography shows the relationship of left coronary artery, 4 mm ablation electrode in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), and mapping electrode in the septal perforating branch (SPB) vein (left and middle). The rightward panel shows coronary sinus venography after successful ablation within the SPB vein causing stenosis of that branch (right). C, Intracardiac electrograms from ablation catheter positioned within the SPB vein showing earliest activation time at the successful ablation site. HIS indicates the HIS bundle location; LAO, left anterior oblique; and RAO, right anterior oblique.DiscussionIntramural septal sites of origin for VT or PVCs are an increasingly recognized location for outflow tract tachycardias. The GCV has been a target of great interest for idiopathic VT mapping since 1998 when it was described by dePaolaet et al.3 One of the first series looking at using both radiofrequency ablation as well as cryoablation in the GCV region was described in a multicenter case series in 2006.4 The SPB veins of the GCV may allow for access to otherwise endocardially inaccessible sites. The recent single-center experience of Yokokawa et al2 has described an intramural focus in 8% of patients with outflow tract VT.The anatomy of this region is complex and is demonstrated in a schematic diagram in Figure 3. The dissection is made horizontally above the mitral and tricuspid annuli and below the aortic cusps. Figure 3, top right panel, shows the septal myocardium separating the RVOT and LVOT. The septal aspect of the RVOT is adjacent to the right coronary cusp posteriorly and the septal portion of the left coronary cusp (LCC) anteriorly. Another dissection was made perpendicularly at the junction of the LCC and right coronary cusp and shows that the aortic cusps lay above the thicker septal myocardium that separates the RVOT and LVOT (Figure 3, bottom right panel).Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 3. The horizontal dissection was made above the mitral and tricuspid annuli and below the aortic valve with a caudal view. The septal myocardium separates the right (RVOT) and left ventricular outflow tracts (LVOT) with septal perforating branch (SPB) veins extending into the myocardium. The dissection was made perpendicularly at the junction of left (LCC) and right coronary cusp (RCC), showing the aortic cusp positioned above the thicker septal myocardium and separating the RVOT and LVOT. The septal portion of myocardium usually extends above the pulmonary valve. AV indicates aortic valve; FO, foramen ovale; GCV, great cardiac vein; LAD, left anterior descending artery; LVIT, left ventricular inflow tract; NCC, noncoronary cusp; PA, pulmonary artery; PV, pulmonary valve; RA, right atrium; and RVIT, right ventricular inflow tract.The SPB veins of the GCV may allow access to the anterior or middle septal myocardium; however, venous branches have significant variability in size. The GCV anatomically follows a purely epicardial course and thus has a more limited role in truly intramural septal origins in contrast to the SPB veins that are intramural in location. The anterior portion of the LCC is at the septal aspect of the LVOT. The right coronary cusp is located more posteriorly at the septal aspect of the LVOT. The slightly anterior aspect of RVOT, GCV, and LCC form a triangle with similar distance between them. Equally early ventricular activation times during mapping at the site of the anterior RVOT, LCC, and GCV may indicate a deeper intramural septal origin. Mapping of the GCV guided by venography or the use of smaller multielectrode catheters may be useful. Other options to ablate intramural septal sites of origin can be ablation via the endocardial surface of the RVOT or LVOT/aortic cusps. Additionally, coronary arteriography should be performed; however, the SPB veins are usually somewhat distant from any main coronary artery branches.Multiple ECG algorithms have been devised to predict the site of origin for outflow tract tachycardias. However, there are different ECG characteristics in our 2 cases with the same origin. One reason may be preferential conduction to either aspect of the ventricular septum. For this reason, comprehensive mapping of the GCV and SPB veins can be useful to precisely delineate the location of origin.DisclosuresNone.FootnotesCorrespondence to Michael Shehata, MD, Heart Rhythm Center, The Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Health System, Los Angeles, CA 90048. E-mail [email protected]References1. Yamada T, Okada T, Murakami Y, Yoshida N, Murohara T, Kay GN. Premature ventricular contractions arising from the intramural ventricular septum.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009; 32:e1–e3.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Yokokawa M, Good E, Chugh A, Pelosi F, Crawford T, Jongnarangsin K, Latchamsetty R, Oral H, Morady F, Bogun F. Intramural idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias originating in the intraventricular septum: mapping and ablation.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012; 5:258–263.LinkGoogle Scholar3. de Paola AA, Melo WD, Távora MZ, Martinez EE. Angiographic and electrophysiological substrates for ventricular tachycardia mapping through the coronary veins.Heart. 1998; 79:59–63.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. Obel OA, d'Avila A, Neuzil P, Saad EB, Ruskin JN, Reddy VY. Ablation of left ventricular epicardial outflow tract tachycardia from the distal great cardiac vein.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48:1813–1817.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Tam T, Ghannam M, Liang J, Attili A, Cochet H, Jais P, Juhoor M, Latchamsetty R, Jongnarangsin K, Morady F and Bogun F (2022) Intramural mapping of intramural septal ventricular arrhythmias, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 10.1111/jce.15410, 33:5, (975-981), Online publication date: 1-May-2022. Guandalini G, Santangeli P, Schaller R, Pothineni N, Briceño D, Enriquez A, Razminia P, Tung R, Marchlinski F and Garcia F (2022) Intramyocardial mapping of ventricular premature depolarizations via septal venous perforators: Differentiating the superior intraseptal region from left ventricular summit origins, Heart Rhythm, 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.03.004, Online publication date: 1-Mar-2022. Hadjis A, Frontera A, Limite L, Lipartiti F, Tsitsinakis G, Vlachos K, Becker G, Sturmer M, Jaïs P, Hsia H, Gerstenfeld E and Della Bella P (2021) Landing on the spot: Approaches to outflow tract PVCs; from ECG to EGMs to intracardiac echocardiography, Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 10.1111/pace.14290, 44:8, (1449-1463), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2021. Cronin E, Bogun F, Maury P, Peichl P, Chen M, Namboodiri N, Aguinaga L, Leite L, Al-Khatib S, Anter E, Berruezo A, Callans D, Chung M, Cuculich P, d'Avila A, Deal B, Della Bella P, Deneke T, Dickfeld T, Hadid C, Haqqani H, Kay G, Latchamsetty R, Marchlinski F, Miller J, Nogami A, Patel A, Pathak R, Saenz Morales L, Santangeli P, Sapp J, Sarkozy A, Soejima K, Stevenson W, Tedrow U, Tzou W, Varma N and Zeppenfeld K (2020) 2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: Executive summary, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 10.1007/s10840-019-00664-2, 59:1, (81-133), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2020. Cronin E, Bogun F, Maury P, Peichl P, Chen M, Namboodiri N, Aguinaga L, Leite L, Al-Khatib S, Anter E, Berruezo A, Callans D, Chung M, Cuculich P, d'Avila A, Deal B, Bella P, Deneke T, Dickfeld T, Hadid C, Haqqani H, Kay G, Latchamsetty R, Marchlinski F, Miller J, Nogami A, Patel A, Pathak R, Saenz Morales L, Santangeli P, Sapp J, Sarkozy A, Soejima K, Stevenson W, Tedrow U, Tzou W, Varma N and Zeppenfeld K (2020) 2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 10.1007/s10840-019-00663-3, 59:1, (145-298), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2020. Cronin E, Bogun F, Maury P, Peichl P, Chen M, Namboodiri N, Aguinaga L, Leite L, Al-Khatib S, Anter E, Berruezo A, Callans D, Chung M, Cuculich P, d'Avila A, Deal B, Della Bella P, Deneke T, Dickfeld T, Hadid C, Haqqani H, Kay G, Latchamsetty R, Marchlinski F, Miller J, Nogami A, Patel A, Pathak R, Saenz Morales L, Santangeli P, Sapp J, Sarkozy A, Soejima K, Stevenson W, Tedrow U, Tzou W, Varma N and Zeppenfeld K (2020) 2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: executive summary, EP Europace, 10.1093/europace/euz332, 22:3, (450-495), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2020. Cronin E, Bogun F, Maury P, Peichl P, Chen M, Namboodiri N, Aguinaga L, Leite L, Al-Khatib S, Anter E, Berruezo A, Callans D, Chung M, Cuculich P, d'Avila A, Deal B, Della Bella P, Deneke T, Dickfeld T, Hadid C, Haqqani H, Kay G, Latchamsetty R, Marchlinski F, Miller J, Nogami A, Patel A, Pathak R, Saenz Morales L, Santangeli P, Sapp J, Sarkozy A, Soejima K, Stevenson W, Tedrow U, Tzou W, Varma N and Zeppenfeld K (2020) 2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: Executive summary, Heart Rhythm, 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.03.014, 17:1, (e155-e205), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2020. Cronin E, Bogun F, Maury P, Peichl P, Chen M, Namboodiri N, Aguinaga L, Leite L, Al-Khatib S, Anter E, Berruezo A, Callans D, Chung M, Cuculich P, d'Avila A, Deal B, Della Bella P, Deneke T, Dickfeld T, Hadid C, Haqqani H, Kay G, Latchamsetty R, Marchlinski F, Miller J, Nogami A, Patel A, Pathak R, Saenz Morales L, Santangeli P, Sapp J, Sarkozy A, Soejima K, Stevenson W, Tedrow U, Tzou W, Varma N and Zeppenfeld K (2020) 2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias, Heart Rhythm, 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.03.002, 17:1, (e2-e154), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2020. Okishige K, Nakamura R, Yamauchi Y, Keida T, Sasano T and Hirao K (2019) Chemical ablation of ventricular tachycardia arising from the left ventricular summit, Clinical Case Reports, 10.1002/ccr3.1397, 7:11, (2036-2041), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2019. Cronin E, Bogun F, Maury P, Peichl P, Chen M, Namboodiri N, Aguinaga L, Leite L, Al-Khatib S, Anter E, Berruezo A, Callans D, Chung M, Cuculich P, d'Avila A, Deal B, Della Bella P, Deneke T, Dickfeld T, Hadid C, Haqqani H, Kay G, Latchamsetty R, Marchlinski F, Miller J, Nogami A, Patel A, Pathak R, Sáenz Morales L, Santangeli P, Sapp J, Sarkozy A, Soejima K, Stevenson W, Tedrow U, Tzou W, Varma N, Zeppenfeld K, Asirvatham S, Sternick E, Chyou J, Ernst S, Fenelon G, Gerstenfeld E, Hindricks G, Inoue K, Kim J, Krishnan K, Kuck K, Avalos M, Paul T, Scanavacca M, Tung R, Voss J, Yamada T and Yamane T (2019) 2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias, EP Europace, 10.1093/europace/euz132, 21:8, (1143-1144), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2019. Roca‐Luque I, Rivas‐Gándara N, Francisco‐Pascual J, Rodriguez‐Sanchez J, Cuellar‐Calabria H, Rodriguez‐Palomares J, García‐Del Blanco B, Pérez‐Rodon J, Santos‐Ortega A, Rosés‐Noguer F, Marsal R, Rubio B, García D and Moya Mitjans A (2019) Preprocedural imaging to guide transcoronary ethanol ablation for refractory septal ventricular tachycardia, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 10.1111/jce.13816, 30:3, (448-456), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2019. Issa Z, Miller J and Zipes D (2019) Idiopathic Focal Ventricular Tachycardia Clinical Arrhythmology and Electrophysiology, 10.1016/B978-0-323-52356-1.00023-2, (816-857), . Santangeli P and Callans D (2016) Idiopathic Outflow Tract Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation, Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 9:9, Online publication date: 1-Sep-2016.Kreidieh B, Rodríguez-Mañero M, A. Schurmann P, Ibarra-Cortez S, Dave A and Valderrábano M (2016) Retrograde Coronary Venous Ethanol Infusion for Ablation of Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia, Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 9:7, Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016. Heeger C, Hayashi K, Kuck K and Ouyang F (2016) Catheter Ablation of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias Arising From the Cardiac Outflow Tracts – Recent Insights and Techniques for the Successful Treatment of Common and Challenging Cases –, Circulation Journal, 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0293, 80:5, (1073-1086), . Lerman B (2015) Mechanism, diagnosis, and treatment of outflow tract tachycardia, Nature Reviews Cardiology, 10.1038/nrcardio.2015.121, 12:10, (597-608), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2015. Asirvatham S and Stevenson W (2014) Editor's Perspective: In the Middle, Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 7:5, (982-983), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2014. October 2014Vol 7, Issue 5 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics © 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.114.001744PMID: 25336368 Manuscript receivedApril 3, 2014Manuscript acceptedJuly 5, 2014Originally publishedOctober 1, 2014 Keywordscatheter ablationtachycardia, ventricularventricular premature complexesPDF download Advertisement SubjectsArrhythmiasCatheter Ablation and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator

Abstract:HomeCirculation: Arrhythmia and ElectrophysiologyVol. 9, No. 9Mechanisms of Posterior Fascicular Tachycardia Free AccessResearch ArticlePDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessResearch ArticlePDF/EPUBMechanisms of Posterior Fascicular TachycardiaThe Relationship Between High Frequency Potentials and the Ventricular Myocardium Qiang Liu, MS, Michael Shehata, MD, Ruhong Jiang, MS, Lu Yu, MD, Jun Zhu, MS, Ashkan Ehdaie, MD, Eugenio Cingolani, MD, Sumeet S. Chugh, MD, Chenyang Jiang, MD and Xunzhang Wang, MD Qiang LiuQiang Liu From the Department of Cardiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, PR China (Q.L., R.J., L.Y., J.Z., C.J.); and Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (Q.L., M.S., A.E., E.C., S.S.C., X.W.) *Q. Liu and Dr Shehata contributed equally to this work. Search for more papers by this author , Michael ShehataMichael Shehata From the Department of Cardiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, PR China (Q.L., R.J., L.Y., J.Z., C.J.); and Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (Q.L., M.S., A.E., E.C., S.S.C., X.W.) *Q. Liu and Dr Shehata contributed equally to this work. Search for more papers by this author , Ruhong JiangRuhong Jiang From the Department of Cardiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, PR China (Q.L., R.J., L.Y., J.Z., C.J.); and Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (Q.L., M.S., A.E., E.C., S.S.C., X.W.) Search for more papers by this author , Lu YuLu Yu From the Department of Cardiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, PR China (Q.L., R.J., L.Y., J.Z., C.J.); and Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (Q.L., M.S., A.E., E.C., S.S.C., X.W.) Search for more papers by this author , Jun ZhuJun Zhu From the Department of Cardiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, PR China (Q.L., R.J., L.Y., J.Z., C.J.); and Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (Q.L., M.S., A.E., E.C., S.S.C., X.W.) Search for more papers by this author , Ashkan EhdaieAshkan Ehdaie From the Department of Cardiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, PR China (Q.L., R.J., L.Y., J.Z., C.J.); and Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (Q.L., M.S., A.E., E.C., S.S.C., X.W.) Search for more papers by this author , Eugenio CingolaniEugenio Cingolani From the Department of Cardiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, PR China (Q.L., R.J., L.Y., J.Z., C.J.); and Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (Q.L., M.S., A.E., E.C., S.S.C., X.W.) Search for more papers by this author , Sumeet S. ChughSumeet S. Chugh From the Department of Cardiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, PR China (Q.L., R.J., L.Y., J.Z., C.J.); and Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (Q.L., M.S., A.E., E.C., S.S.C., X.W.) Search for more papers by this author , Chenyang JiangChenyang Jiang From the Department of Cardiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, PR China (Q.L., R.J., L.Y., J.Z., C.J.); and Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (Q.L., M.S., A.E., E.C., S.S.C., X.W.) Search for more papers by this author and Xunzhang WangXunzhang Wang From the Department of Cardiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, PR China (Q.L., R.J., L.Y., J.Z., C.J.); and Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (Q.L., M.S., A.E., E.C., S.S.C., X.W.) Search for more papers by this author Originally published13 Sep 2016https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003754Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2016;9:e003754Case DescriptionCase 1A 17-year-old man presented with a history of palpitations and surface ECG demonstrating wide QRS tachycardia (QRS duration=140 ms) with a right bundle branch block pattern and left-axis deviation (Figure 1A). The 12-lead ECG was normal during sinus rhythm.Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 1. A, Surface ECG of tachycardia showed wide QRS complex (QRS duration=140 ms) with a right bundle branch block pattern and left-axis deviation. B, During sinus rhythm (left), A–H and H–V intervals were 57 and 55 ms, respectively. P2 was recorded with an antegrade conduction sequence from proximal to distal multielectrode catheter (MEC). The ventricular potentials at the mid MEC were earlier than proximal and distal ventricular potentials. During tachycardia (right), the H–V interval was −30 ms. P1 and P2 were recorded with opposite conduction sequences with P1 activated antegradely, and P2 activated retrogradely. P1 transition to P2 activation occurred toward the distal MEC. C, Right and left anterior oblique fluoroscopic images of catheter positions. The 20 pole MEC was positioned at the left septal ventricle via a retrograde aortic approach. CS indicates coronary sinus electrogram; HIS, His bundle electrogram; His, His bundle; LAF, left anterior fascicle; LAO, left anterior oblique; LPF, left posterior fascicle; LV, left ventricular electrogram; RAO, right anterior oblique; RB, right bundle; and RV, right ventricular electrogram.See Editor’s Perspective by Asirvatham and StevensonDuring electrophysiology study, mapping was performed using a 20 pole multielectrode catheter (MEC) via a retrograde aortic approach (Figure 1C). The baseline A–H and H–V intervals were 57 and 55 ms, respectively (Figure 1B, left). A wide QRS tachycardia identical to the clinical tachycardia was observed with cycle length of 320 ms, H–V interval of −30 ms (Figure 1B, right). This was consistent with a diagnosis of fascicular ventricular tachycardia (FVT) with origin from the left posterior fascicle (LPF). Three distinct potentials could be recorded from the MEC during FVT: A) sharp inflection, high frequency potentials (P1) activated from midproximal to distal MEC; B) presystolic LPF potentials (P2) activated from distal to proximal MEC; and C) left-septal ventricular (V) potentials (Figure 1B, right).Right ventricular programmed stimulation (S1S2, 400/300 ms) was used to induce FVT (Figure 2A). During S1 stimulation, P1 was recorded with a stable S1–P1 interval (S1–P1=255 ms) and the same conduction sequence as during tachycardia. With delivery of an extrastimulus, the S2–P1 interval increased to 320 ms, followed by P2 and V potentials, and induction of sustained FVT.Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 2. A, Ventricular programmed stimulation from the septal right ventricle (S1S2, 400/300 ms) to induce FVT. During S1 stimulation, P1 was recorded with an antegrade conduction sequence and a S1–P1 interval of 255 ms. After the S2 stimulus delivery, the S2–P1 interval increased to 320 ms with induction of FVT. A schematic diagram shows the sequence of FVT induction. The site of possible slow conduction (wavy line) may be located at the proximal P1 region. P1 is the antegrade limb of the reentry circuit and activation of proximal P1 can occur either from retrograde conduction of P2 via the ventricular myocardium (solid arrow) or directly from ventricular myocardium at the distal MEC (open arrow). B, Premature ventricular contractions (PVC) introduced from the midright ventricular septum during tachycardia. A PVC advanced the immediate septal ventricle (V*) and His bundle via the right bundle brunch retrogradely, without alteration of the immediate P1 or P2. The subsequent P1 was advanced by 10 ms and the following P2 and QRS were advanced sequentially. C and D, Atrial overdrive pacing from proximal CS catheter at a cycle length of 300 ms during FVT. C, Progressive antegrade capture of P2 and the Purkinje system was observed with narrowing of the surface QRS morphology. At beat 4, the septal ventricle (V*) at the mid-MEC was advanced by antegrade conduction of P2 without advancement of the ventricular potential at the distal MEC, and the subsequent P1 in beat 5 was advanced. D, The earliest ventricular activation at beat 7 activated by the antegrade conduction of P2 was observed at the mid-MEC. The subsequent P1 (beat 8) initiated FVT with retrograde P2 conduction. Schematic diagrams depict conduction patterns during atrial overdrive pacing. C shows that the LPB is gradually activated antegradely by atrial pacing and that each P1 activation follows previous ventricular activation. D depicts the initiation of tachycardia with the last paced beat 7 activating P1 antegradely (beat 8) and re-entry begins either with retrograde conduction of P2 via the ventricular myocardium (solid arrow) or directly from ventricular myocardium at the distal MEC (open arrow). AVN indicates atrioventricular node; CS, coronary sinus electrogram; FVT, fascicular ventricular tachycardia; HIS, His bundle electrogram; His, His bundle; LV, left ventricular electrogram; LAF, left anterior fascicle; LPF, left posterior fascicle; MEC, multielectrode catheter; RB, right bundle; and RV, right ventricular electrogram.Additional pacing maneuvers were performed during tachycardia.Delivery of Premature Ventricular ContractionPremature ventricular contractions (PVCs) were introduced from the right midventricular septum beginning at 10 ms shorter than the tachycardia cycle length, until loss of ventricular capture or termination of tachycardia. A PVC advanced the immediate septal ventricle and His bundle via the right bundle brunch retrogradely, without advancing the immediate P1 and P2, however, advancing the subsequent P1 by 10 ms. The following P2 and QRS were also advanced sequentially. The P1 and P2 intervals during tachycardia were 315 ms before the PVC. However, the P1 and P2 intervals both shortened to 305 ms after the PVC (Figure 2B).Atrial Overdrive PacingAtrial overdrive pacing was delivered from the proximal coronary sinus at 300 ms (Figure 2C and 2D). The tachycardia converted to a narrow QRS morphology with the His bundle conducting antegradely (noted by a longer A–H interval and antegrade P2 conduction). At the onset of atrial pacing, the proximal portion of P2 was activated antegradely, whereas the distal P2 was still activated retrogradely. The septal ventricular potentials (V*, beat 4) at the mid MEC were advanced by antegrade P2 conduction without a change in cycle length at the distal MEC, and the subsequent P1 (beat 5) was also advanced (Figure 2C). Timing of P1 was simultaneous with the antegrade His bundle activation after the last atrial stimulus (beat 7) without termination of tachycardia (Figure 2D).Radiofrequency ablation targeted at the distal P1 potentials rendered tachycardia noninducible.Case 2A 19-year-old man presented with a history of palpitations and surface ECG demonstrating wide QRS tachycardia (QRS duration=135 ms) with a right bundle branch block pattern and left-axis deviation. During sinus rhythm, the 12-lead ECG was normal.During electrophysiology study, a 20 pole MEC was used via a retrograde aortic approach. The baseline A–H and H–V intervals were 58 ms and 60 ms, respectively (Figure 3A, left). A wide QRS tachycardia identical to the clinical tachycardia was observed with cycle length of 310 ms, H–V interval of −20 ms and 2:1 retrograde conduction (Figure 3A, right). Three distinct potentials P1, P2, and V potentials of the left septum were recorded at the MEC (Figure 3A, right). During tachycardia, PVCs were delivered from the right ventricular apex. A PVC advanced the immediate septal ventricle without advancing the immediate P1 and P2, however, advancing the subsequent P1, and the following P2 and QRS were also advanced sequentially (not shown).Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 3. A, During sinus rhythm (left), A–H and H–V intervals were 58 and 60 ms, respectively. P2 was recorded with an antegrade conduction sequence from proximal to distal MEC. The earliest ventricular potential was located at the distal MEC. During tachycardia (right), the H–V interval was −20 ms with 2:1 retrograde conduction. P1 and P2 were recorded with opposite conduction sequences with P1 activated antegradely and P2 activated retrogradely. P1 transition to P2 activation occurred toward the mid-distal MEC, simultaneous with the earliest recorded ventricular potential. B, During tachycardia, radiofrequency ablation was delivered at the location where the distal P1 fused with P2 and ventricular myocardium. After radiofrequency delivery, tachycardia was terminated with disconnection of the distal P1 potentials. Schematic diagrams show the potential reentrant circuit (left) and the termination of the tachycardia with antegrade block of distal P1 after ablation (right). C, After cessation of ablation, a delayed antegrade conduction of P1 was observed during either programmed ventricular pacing or sinus rhythm. Schematic diagrams show the P1 was antegradely activated during RVA pacing (left) and sinus rhythm (right). D, During ablation at the level of the proximal P1 potentials, automaticity arising from the P2 or local ventricle was noted with subsequent elimination of the P1 potentials. Schematic diagram shows the antegrade and retrograde block of the P1 fiber. ABL indicates ablation catheter; AVN, atrioventricular node; CS, coronary sinus electrogram; HIS, His bundle electrogram; His, His bundle; LAF, left anterior fascicle; LPF, left posterior fascicle; LV, left ventricular electrogram; MEC, multielectrode catheter; RB, right bundle; and RV, right ventricular electrogram.Ablation of the P1 PotentialsA large curve deflectable sheath and a 4-mm saline-irrigated ablation catheter (SJM) were used to ablate via a trans-septal approach. Radiofrequency ablation was delivered at the location where the distal P1 fused with P2 and ventricular myocardium. After radiofrequency delivery, tachycardia was terminated with disconnection of the distal P1 potentials (Figure 3B). After cessation of ablation, P1 potentials were recorded during either sinus rhythm or ventricular pacing, and delayed conduction to P1 was observed (Figure 3C). Further attempts were then made to ablate the proximal P1 during sinus rhythm. During ablation, automaticity arising from the P2 or local ventricle was noted with elimination of the P1 potentials (Figure 3D). Tachycardia could not be induced after ablation.Case 3A 33-year-old man presented with a history of palpitations and surface ECG demonstrating wide QRS tachycardia (QRS duration=125 ms) with a right bundle branch block pattern and left-axis deviation (Figure 4A). During sinus rhythm, the 12-lead ECG was normal.Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 4. A, Surface ECG of tachycardia showed wide QRS complex (QRS duration=125 ms) with a right bundle branch block pattern and left-axis deviation. B, During sinus rhythm (left), A–H and H–V intervals were 75 and 60 ms, respectively. P2 was recorded with an antegrade conduction sequence from proximal to distal MEC. The earliest ventricular potential was located at the mid-distal MEC. During tachycardia (right), the H–V interval was −5 ms with 1:1 retrograde conduction. P2 potentials were recorded with a retrograde conduction sequence from mid-distal to proximal MEC. C, Right and left anterior oblique fluoroscopic images of catheter positions. D, Premature ventricular contractions (PVC) introduced from the midright ventricular septum during tachycardia. A PVC (Induced by the second stimulus) advanced the immediate high septal ventricle (V*) without alteration of the immediate P2. The subsequent P2 is advanced by 15 ms, and the following QRS was advanced sequentially. Schematic diagram in the right depicts the potential reentrant circuit of the tachycardia. E, Overdrive pacing from the right midseptal ventricle during tachycardia at cycle lengths of 305, 300, 290, and 270 ms. Surface ECG demonstrates entrainment of tachycardia with progressive fusion of QRS morphology during decreasing pacing cycle length. F, Theoretically, ablation targeting the distal or proximal LPF away from the optimal target may result in different changes in QRS morphology during tachycardia. Schematic diagram shows the potential mechanisms. Left, the reentrant circuit may involve both the right bundle branch and the left anterior fascicle after ablating the distal part of the LPF away from the target, a narrow QRS morphology may be observed with positive H–V interval; Right, a wider QRS morphology with left-axis deviation and more negative H–V interval may emerge after ablating the proximal part of the LPF away from the target because of loss of antegrade conduction from the right bundle branch and left anterior fascicle. AVN indicates atrioventricular node; CS, coronary sinus electrogram; HIS, His bundle electrogram; His, His bundle; LAF, left anterior fascicle; LAO, left anterior oblique; LPF, left posterior fascicle; LV, left ventricular electrogram; MEC, multielectrode catheter; RAO, right anterior oblique; RB, right bundle; RV, right ventricular electrogram; and SS, overdrive pacing cycle length.A 20 pole MEC was used via a retrograde aortic approach during electrophysiology study.The baseline A–H and H–V intervals were 75 and 60 ms, respectively (Figure 4B, left). A wide QRS tachycardia identical to the clinical tachycardia was observed with cycle length of 330 ms, H–V interval of −5 ms and 1:1 retrograde conduction (Figure 4B, right). No manifest P1 potential could be recorded even with adjusting the MEC position along the septum. P2 potentials were observed along the MEC with earliest potentials seen at the midseptal left ventricle fluoroscopically.Delivery of PVCDuring tachycardia, PVCs were delivered from the midright ventricular septum. A PVC advanced the immediate proximal septal ventricle without advancing the immediate P2 and the septal ventricle from mid to distal; however, there was advancement of the subsequent P2 and QRS by 15 ms (Figure 4D).Ventricular Overdrive PacingVentricular overdrive pacing was delivered from the midright ventricular septum at different cycle lengths (Figure 4E). Entrainment of tachycardia and progressive fusion of QRS morphology were observed during decreasing pacing cycle length.Atrial overdrive pacing failed to conduct through the His bundle antegradely. Radiofrequency ablation targeted at the earliest portion of P2 rendered tachycardia noninducible.DiscussionLeft posterior FVT is the most common type of fascicular tachycardia involving the left ventricular conduction system and may have multiple underlying mechanisms. Nogami et al1 and Morishima et al2 suggested that P2 may be a bystander of the FVT, and the left ventricular myocardium and P1 may comprise the reentry circuit.In the first 2 cases, 2 distinct sharp potentials (P1 and P2) were recorded during tachycardia with a negative H–V interval (H–V= −30 and −20 ms, respectively). Tachycardia demonstrated a negative H–V interval indicating activation of the P2 at the mid to low LPF where P1 inserted antegradely (Figure 1B, right; Figure 3A, right). In the third case, the H–V interval during tachycardia was less negative (−5 ms) suggestive of a more proximal initial activation of the LPF (Figure 4B, right).During sinus rhythm in case 1, P2 conducted with an antegrade activation sequence was recorded preceding the onset of local V potential without recording of P1 (Figure 1B, left). Earliest local ventricular activation appeared to be at the middle portion of the MEC suggesting a connection of LPF to ventricular myocardium at the midseptal location. Right ventricular programmed stimulation was performed, and P1 was noted following the local V potential with antegrade conduction and a stable S1–P1 interval (S1–P1 = 255 ms). We also noted that P1 was not conducted antegradely to the distal MEC during ventricular stimulation suggestive of conduction block at the distal P1 or concealed retrograde conduction. With extrastimulus delivery, the S2–P1 interval increased by 65 ms (S2–P1=320 ms), and tachycardia was induced with retrograde P2 conduction from distal to proximal MEC after P1 conduction from proximal to distal MEC (Figure 2A).During tachycardia, PVCs were introduced from the right midseptal ventricle. The local V potentials were advanced without advancement of the immediate P1 or P2, and the subsequent P1 and P2 were advanced by 10 ms (Figure 2B). These findings confirm the involvement of ventricular myocardium as part of the reentry circuit.With atrial overdrive pacing from the coronary sinus during tachycardia, gradual antegrade activation of the His-Purkinje system was noted after the second paced beat (Figure 2C and 2D). The fourth beat demonstrates LPF (P2) activation from proximal to mid poles and slightly advanced local ventricular activation at the mid MEC poles. The distal retrograde activation of P2 and timing of ventricular activation at the distal MEC remained unaffected; however, the subsequent P1 (beat 5) was advanced. The proximal P1 must be activated by the mid portion of the LPF (P2) via ventricular myocardium and a slow conduction zone. After the last atrial stimulus, the timing of antegrade P1 (beat 7) was simultaneous with the His bundle potential which indicated that P1 was activated from the previous ventricular complex (beat 6). The antegrade activation of P2 (beat 7) from the last atrial stimulus conducts through ventricular myocardium that was connected to the subsequent P1 (beat 8) fiber with continuation of tachycardia. This suggests the involvement of 2 distinct reentry circuits in FVT. Both involve a slow conduction zone linked to the proximal P1 region. However, one circuit may include only the ventricular myocardium and the proximal P1 fiber with retrograde P2 conduction acting as a passive bystander. An alternative circuit utilizing retrograde LPF (P2) as part of the reentry circuit combines with the mid ventricular myocardium and proximal portion of P1. In this case, the successful ablation site was near the distal LPF, where the P1 transitioned to P2 activation.In the second case, a similar conduction sequence of P1 and P2 was observed during tachycardia (Figure 3A, right). However, we observed that there was a more distal connection between the LPF (P2) and ventricular myocardium during sinus rhythm (Figure 3A, left). Before ablation, P1 was retrogradely activated via the distal LPF, and P1 potentials were fused with V potentials at the MEC during sinus rhythm. After ablation at the site where distal P1 connected with P2 and ventricular myocardium, P1 was recorded during either sinus rhythm or right ventricular apex pacing, with significant delayed antegrade conduction following ventricular potentials (Figure 3C). After ablation of the proximal P1 region, total elimination of the proximal P1 activation from ventricular myocardium was observed (Figure 3D). This is evidence that P1 is critical to the reentry circuit and that ablation is feasible by either targeting the proximal or distal P1 region.In contrast to the above 2 cases, during tachycardia, the third case had a slightly negative H–V interval (−5 ms), a relatively narrow QRS duration, and no manifest P1 could be recorded. The response to PVC delivery and the progressive fusion of QRS morphology noted during entrainment with decreasing pacing cycle length suggests a re-entrant mechanism of tachycardia with ventricular myocardium as part of the reentrant circuit, similar to those cases with a manifest recorded P1 and more negative H–V interval during tachycardia. The earliest LPF potentials were observed at the location of the midseptal left ventricle, and successful ablation was targeted at this area. We hypothesize a P1 fiber with a short length anatomically or nonparallel in orientation to the LPF and inserts into the LPF at the mid septum, with a slow conduction zone linked to the proximal P1 region. The potential reentrant circuit is shown as a schematic diagram (Figure 4D, right).Catheter ablation guided by the relationship of P1 and P2 potentials recorded by the MEC may be useful for evaluation of the underlying substrate of FVT.For the type of FVT with a more negative H–V interval and manifest recorded P1 during tachycardia, the successful ablation target should be the P1 potentials. However, the ideal level of P1 for ablation may be at a more distal site of P1 to avoid possible delayed conduction at the more proximal LPF.For the other type of FVT with a slightly negative H–V interval and no manifest recorded P1 during tachycardia, the successful ablation target should be the earliest P2 potential. Theoretically, ablation targeting the distal or proximal LPF away from the optimal target may result in different changes in QRS morphology during tachycardia. The schematic diagram (Figure 4F) shows the potential mechanisms of these alterations. A narrow QRS morphology with positive H–V interval may be observed after ablating the distal part of the LPF away from the target, because the reentrant circuit may involve both the right bundle branch and the left anterior bundle branch after the ablation (Figure 4F, left). Contrarily, a wider QRS morphology with left-axis deviation and more negative H–V interval may emerge after ablating the proximal part of the LPF away from the target (Figure 4F, right).ConclusionsIt is possible that left posterior FVT may involve more than one form of reentrant circuit. We describe 2 types of FVT characterized by H–V interval. The first type has a more negative H–V interval with manifest recorded P1. The second type has a slightly negative H–V interval without recorded P1. Re-entry was the common mechanism of the 2 types of FVT. The reentrant circuit consists of ventricular myocardium, a Purkinje fiber (P1), a slow conduction zone exists at the proximal P1 region, and a part of LPF (P2) that connects distal P1 and ventricular myocardium. This unique slow conduction region may be part of ventricular myocardium, proximal P1, or other Purkinje fibers, which demonstrate delayed conduction properties and may represent a substrate for this arrhythmia. The successful ablation target should be the P1 potentials for the type of FVT with recorded P1, whereas the earliest P2 potential should be the successful target for the type of FVT without manifest recorded P1. Ablation at the different positions of P2 away from optimal target may change the reentrant circuit and the QRS morphology during tachycardia.DisclosuresNone.Footnotes*Q. Liu and Dr Shehata contributed equally to this work.Correspondence to Chenyang Jiang, MD, Department of Cardiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 3rd East Qingchun Rd, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310016, PR China. E-mail [email protected]References1. Nogami A, Naito S, Tada H, Taniguchi K, Okamoto Y, Nishimura S, Yamauchi Y, Aonuma K, Goya M, Iesaka Y, Hiroe M. Demonstration of diastolic and presystolic Purkinje potentials as critical potentials in a macroreentry circuit of verapamil-sensitive idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36:811–823.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Morishima I, Nogami A, Tsuboi H, Sone T. Negative participation of the left posterior fascicle in the reentry circuit of verapamil-sensitive idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012; 23:556–559. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02251.x.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Sun M, Wang J, Wang Z, Liang M, Yang G, Jin Z, Liang Y and Han Y (2021) The change of cardiac axis deviation in catheter ablation of verapamil‐sensitive idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia, Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 10.1111/pace.14192, 44:4, (685-692), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2021. Michowitz Y and Belhassen B (2018) New Insights on Verapamil-Sensitive Idiopathic Left Fascicular Tachycardia, Journal of Electrocardiology, 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.06.007, 51:5, (874-878), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2018. Liu Q, Shehata M, Jiang R, Yu L, Chen S, Zhu J, Ehdaie A, Sovari A, Cingolani E, Chugh S, Jiang C and Wang X (2016) Macroreentrant Loop in Ventricular Tachycardia From the Left Posterior Fascicle, Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 9:9, Online publication date: 1-Sep-2016.Asirvatham S and Stevenson W (2016) The Fast Zone for Reentry, Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 9:9, Online publication date: 1-Sep-2016. September 2016Vol 9, Issue 9 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics © 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003754PMID: 27625168 Manuscript receivedAugust 26, 2015Manuscript acceptedFebruary 1, 2016Originally publishedSeptember 13, 2016 Keywordsarrhythmias, cardiactachycardia, ventricularcatheter ablationPDF download Advertisement SubjectsArrhythmiasElectrophysiology

Idiopathic Epicardial Left Outflow Tract Ventricular Tachycardia

Electrocardiographic and Electrophysiological Characteristics of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias Ablated Through Percutaneous Trans-Pericardial Approach

Intramural Outflow Tract Ventricular Tachycardia: Anatomy, Mapping, and Ablation.

Electrocardiographic and Electrophysiological Characteristics of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias Ablated Through a Percutaneous Trans-pericardial Approach

Wide QRS Tachycardia with Two P Wave Morphologies: What is the Mechanism?

Ablation of Idiopathic Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Tachycardia: Current Perspectives

Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia Originating from the Diverticulum of the Right Ventricular Outflow Tract

Epicardial Catheter Ablation of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias Originating from Uncommon Epicardial Sites

Intramural Outflow Tract Ventricular Tachycardia

[Repetitive Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia Arising from Left His-Purkinje System].

Spatial and transmural properties of the reentrant ventricular tachycardia circuit in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: Simultaneous epicardial and endocardial recordings

Electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic characteristics of idiopathic right ventricular arrhythmias originating near the His-bundle

Simultaneous Endocardial and Epicardial Delineation of 3D Reentrant Ventricular Tachycardia.

Idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia: new insights into electrophysiological characteristics and radiofrequency catheter ablation

Left Ventricular Tachycardia Originating Near the Left Main Coronary Artery

A New Electrophysiologic Observation in Patients with Idiopathic Left Ventricular Tachycardia.

Mechanisms of Posterior Fascicular Tachycardia

Electrophysiological Characteristics of Bundle Branch Reentry Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients Without Structural Heart Disease.

Unique Electrocardiographic Pattern “w” Wave in Lead I of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias Arising from the Distal Great Cardiac Vein

Refractory Electrical Storm in a 50-Year-old Man.

Rate of Change of Initial Intrinsicoid Deflection Predicts Endocardial Versus Epicardial Ventricular Tachycardia