Performance of the classification criteria for early rheumatoid arthritis in a multi-center cohort

叶华,苏茵,李茹,赵金霞,刘湘源,梅轶芳,张志毅,郭嘉隆,毕黎琦
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-7480.2014.12.003
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the classification criteria for early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) in a multi-center cohort,and compare the specificity and sensitivity among ERA criteria,1987 ACR criteria and 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria.Methods Patients who had arthritic complaints with disease duration no more than 1 year,and age more than 18 years were enrolled.The clinical and laboratory parameters were recorded.The patients were diagnosed by 2 experienced rheumatologists based on the clinical and laboratory features.Undiagnosed patients were followed up every 3 months till 1 year.Chi-square test was performed to compare among groups.Mc Nemar test was performed to compare the sensitivity and specifity.Score test were used to test the positive and negative predictive values.Results A total of 271 patients were enrolled in this study.By the end of one year follow-up,120 patients were diagnosed as RA,136 patients were diagnosed to be other diseases,and 15 patients remained unclassified.The sensitivity of ERA criteria (76.7%) was much higher than 1987 ACR criteria (51.7%),there was significant difference (x2=1 1.524,P<0.01; x2=26.471,P<0.01),and similar to 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria (70.0%); while the specificity among the three criteria was similar.Conclusion The diagnostic value of the ERA criteria is better than 1987 ACR criteria,and it is more simple than 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria.The ERA criteria may be applicable to clinical practice for early RA diagnosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?