Abstract:Rationale and Objectives To assess the consistency between ultrasound and dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for the diagnosis of gout in the knee joint. Materials and Methods The ultrasound and DECT images of 176 knee joints from 167 patients diagnosed with gout at the Gout Specialty Clinic of Qingdao University Affiliated Hospital from February 2022 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The knee joint was segmented into five anatomical regions: intra-articular, anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral. The location of monosodium urate (MSU) crystal deposition was recorded. Tophi were classified as hypoechogenic, isoechogenic, hyperechogenic, or strongly echogenic. The Kappa test was used to assess the consistency between the two examination methods in different regions of the knee joint. The McNemar chi-square test was utilized to conduct a differential analysis between the DECT and ultrasound results. The chi-square test was used to assess differences in the rate of tophi detection with different echogenicities by DECT. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlation between MSU crystal deposition volume and clinically relevant indicators. Results Double contour (61.4%) was the most common intra-articular ultrasound sign. In the extra-articular region, MSU crystals were commonly deposited in and around the popliteal groove region (ultrasound: 52.3%; DECT: 60.0%). Corresponding MSU deposits on DECT were found in 7 of 54 joints with aggregates detected on ultrasound, and in 15 of 108 joints with DC. Tophi with hyperechogenicity or strong echogenicity were more likely to be detected on DECT than those with hypoechoic or isoechoic features (84.3% and 90.9% vs. 55.1% and 27.8%, respectively). For the assessment of MSU deposits, ultrasound showed an overall higher positive rate than DECT (81.1% vs. 72.2%), with poor consistency between the two examinations ( κ = 0.177). In distinct anatomical regions, ultrasound and DECT showed high consistency in the medial ( κ = 0.651) and lateral ( κ = 0.705) views, with no significant difference. The intra-articular ( κ = 0.316) and anterior ( κ = 0.346) regions exhibited only fair consistency, with statistically significant diagnostic differences. When exclusively assessing cases with tophi, ultrasound and DECT demonstrated similar consistency in the medial, lateral and anterior views ( κ = 0.633, 0.712, and 0.400, respectively), with statistically significant differences. In the intra-articular region, the consistency was reduced ( κ = 0.237), and the differences were statistically significant. Conclusion Ultrasound and DECT are effective methods to detect MSU deposition in gout of the knee. However, the consistency between the two techniques varies in different anatomical locations. Clinical assessment should be tailored based on the specific anatomical position. DECT is advantageous for the evaluation of intra-articular MSU deposits, while ultrasound is more sensitive for the early detection of scattered MSU deposits.

Evaluation of dual-energy CT in patients with gout

The Role of Advanced Imaging in Gout Management

The Value of Dual-Energy CT Imaging In The Clinical Diagnosis of Gout

Epidemiologic study of the distribution of urate crystals in patients with gout by foot dual-energy CT

Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of dual-energy CT and ultrasound in gouty arthritis

The application of dual-energy computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute gouty arthritis

Concordance of Ultrasound and Dual-Energy CT in Diagnosing Gouty Arthritis in the Knee Joint: A Retrospective Observational Study

Systemic staging for urate crystal deposits with dual-energy CT and ultrasound in patients with suspected gout

Detection of uric acid depositing in tophaceous gout using a new dual energy spectral CT technology.

Dual energy CT in gout: a prospective validation study

Dual energy CT findings in gout with rapid kilovoltage-switching source with gemstone scintillator detector

Detection of Uric Acid Crystal Deposition by Ultrasonography and Dual-Energy Computed Tomography

[Application of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for Detecting Uric Acid Deposition in Patients with Gout].

Features Of Urate Deposition In Patients With Gouty Arthritis Of The Foot Using Dual-Energy Computed Tomography

Application of Dual Energy Computed Tomography for Detecting Uric Acid Deposition

Preliminary Experience of Dual Source,dual Energy CT in Detection of Gout

Case Series: Dual-Energy CT in Extra-Articular Manifestations of Gout: Main Teaching Point: Dual-energy CT is a valuable asset in the detection of extra-articular manifestations of gout

Role of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in the Identification of Monosodium Urate Deposition in Gout Patients: A Comprehensive Analysis of 828 Joints According to Structural Joint Damage

ROLE OF DUAL ENERGY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGING IN GOUT

Clinical Utility of Dual-Energy CT for Evaluation of Tophaceous Gout

Dual-energy Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Acute Gouty Arthritis