Effects of pioglitazone on electrical cardioversion and inflammatory level in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

Jun GU,Wei HU,Zhi-ping SONG,Da-dong ZHANG,Xu LIU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13333/j.cnki.cjcpe.2015.03.010
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To test if peroxisome proliferators activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-γ) agonists pioglitazone reduce atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after electrical cardioversion (EC) by modifying systemic inflammation.Methods In this randomized and prospective trial,patients with persistent AF and type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomized into pioglitazone group or control group before EC.Patients in pioglitazone group received pioglitazone and standard therapy,while patients in control gourp took no pioglitazone in addition to standard therapy during this study.Treatment was continued for 3 months or until AF recurred.Serum inflammatory markers [high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP),interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)] were measured at baseline and on follow-up.Results Fortyeight and forty-nine patients were enrolled in pioglitazone and control group,respectively.AF recurred in 22 (45.8%) of pioglitazone and 24 (49.0%) of control group (P=0.756) during 3 months follow-up.There was no significant difference in the time to recurrence using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates (P =0.567 by Log Rank test).However,all determined inflammatory markers,hs-CRP,IL-6 and TNF-α were significantly lowered with pioglitazone treatment during follow-up.And Cox proportional hazards regression models showed that the predictors of recurrence included AF duration (relative risk RR 1.002,95% CI 1.003-1.061,P=0.037) and left atrial diameter (RR 1.131,95% CI 1.029-1.242,P =0.010).Conclusions Even though reducing some inflammatory markers,PPARγagonist (pioglitazone) don't affect the recurrence of AF after EC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?