Endovascular treatment of Stanford Type B aortic dissection involving distal aortic arch
Zheng-dong FANG,He-jie HU,Xiao-tian WANG,Xiao-jie SUN,Xin-bao GE,Can CHENG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19418/j.cnki.issn2096-0646.2016.05.04
2016-01-01
Abstract:ObjectiveTo evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of various endovascular repair methods for the treatment of Stanford type B aortic dissection involving distal aortic arch.MethodsThe clinical data of 42 patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection involving distal aortic arch from January 2005 to December 2015 in Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University was analyzed retrospectively. All the patients were treated with endovascular repair. According to the morphology of aortic dissection, the following methods were used: directly coverage the oriifce of left subclavian artery (LSA), chimney technique, fenestrated grafts, neck vascular bypass surgery. ResultsIn 42 patients, 32 cases received LSA coverage, among which 3 cases with typeⅠ endoleak, 6 cases with type Ⅱ endoleak, 2 cases were improved through left subclavian artery embolism. After surgery, 1 case with lower limbs paraplegia, 1 case with steal blood syndrome, 2 cases with upper limb ischemia. After conservative treatment, the above symptoms were all improved. Chimney technique was performed in 4 cases, among which 2 cases occured endoleak. Fenestration technique was performed in 4 cases. Left common carotid artery and subclavian artery were reconstructed in 2 cases through neck vascular bypass surgery. No perioperative death occurred. After long-term follow-up, all the brachial stent-grafts were patent. Most endoleak were disappeared gradually, endoleak still existed in 3 cases with no change of aneurysm diameter.ConclusionsEndovascular treatment is a safe and effective method for Stanford type B aortic dissection involving distal aortic arch, in the meantime, strict preoperative evaluation and suitable operation method are also important.