A Comparative Study Between Scar Hidden and Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy

梁俊杰,由田,刘志龙,胡友主
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2018.06.011
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the application value of scar hidden laparoscopic appendectomy (SHLA). Methods A retrospectively analysis was made on clinical data of 107 patients underwent SHLA and 134 patients underwent conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) from July 2011 to June 2016. The operative time, operative blood loss, postoperative exhaust time, pain score, postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay and cosmetic score were compared between the two groups. Results All the operations of both groups were successful without conversion to open surgery. There were 1 case of wound infection in the SHLA group and 1 case of wound infection and 1 case of incision fat necrosis in the CLA group. There were no significant differences in operative time [(48. 0 ± 15. 9) min vs. (45. 2 ± 11. 5) min, t=1. 585, P=0. 114], operative blood loss [(12. 9 ± 8. 4) ml vs. (14. 0 ± 10. 7) ml, t= -0. 870, P=0. 385], postoperative exhaust time [(1. 3 ± 0. 7) d vs. (1. 3 ± 0. 5) d, t=0. 000, P=1. 000], pain score [(4. 9 ± 1. 2) points vs. (5. 2 ± 1. 5) points, t= -1. 683, P=0. 094], postoperative complications [0. 9% vs. 1. 5%, χ2=0. 000, P=1. 000], and postoperative hospital stay [(3. 2 ± 1. 1) d vs. (3. 5 ± 1. 4) d, t= -1. 814, P=0. 071] between SHLA and CLA. The cosmetic score in the SHLA group was higher than that in the CLA group [(4. 4 ± 0. 6) points vs. (4. 0 ± 0. 9) points, t=3. 949, P=0. 000]. Conclusion SHLA is safe and feasible for acute appendicitis with favourable cosmetic results.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?