The Influence of Local Injection of C-type Natriuretic Peptide on Fracture Healing in a Rat Model

宋正鑫,祝腾蛟,刘冰川,周方,田耘
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2017.09.018
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the promoting effect of C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) on facture healing in a rat model.Methods A total of 36 Sprague-Dawley (SD) male rats were employed for induction of femoral fracture model in three randomly divided groups (12 for each group).Rats in Group 1 received local injection of 1 ml gel containing 25 μg of CNP, rats in Group 2 were treated with local injection of 1 ml of gel, and rats in Group 3 were provided with 1 ml of saline solution at the same position.The X-ray was performed for each group after fracture at each week (0, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th weeks).Furthermore, legs of 7 rats in each group were harvested in the 3rd week and the remaining 5 rats in each group were obtained in the 4th week.The progression of fracture healing of each specimen was assessed by micro-CT.Mechanical tests of the femora and fractures were carried out at the 3rd and 4th weeks.Results The X-ray showed that some rats of the Group 1 appeared the formation of bone bridge at the site of fracture at 3rd and 4th weeks after surgery, while the Group 2 and 3 did not appear bone bridge at the end of experiment in all rats.The results of micro-CT showed that the volume of callus in the Group 1 at the fracture site at 3rd week was (187.655±62.864) mm3, which was higher than that in the Group 2 (137.703±52.592) mm3 and Group 3 (176.493±75.193) mm3, but the differences were not statistically significant (F=1.167, P=0.334).At the 4th week, the volumes of callus in the Group 1, 2, and 3 were (242.853±139.252) mm3, (242.460±64.844) mm3, and (226.274±77.418) mm3, respectively, and there were no significant differences among the 3 groups (F=0.045, P=0.956).Four rats in the Group 1 reached the standard of fracture healing at the 3rd week, but none in the Group 2 or Group 3.At the 4th week, there were another 4 rats reaching the standard of fracture healing in the Group 1, but none in the Group 2 or 3.The biomechanical test results showed that 4 rats in the Group 1 completed the biomechanical test at the 3rd week, none in the Group 2, and 1 rat in the Group 3.At the 4th week, 4 rats completed the biomechanical test in the Group 1 but none in the Group 2 or Group 3.Conclusion Treatment with local CNP injection accelerates fracture healing in a SD rat model.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?