Abstract:Accumulation of experience with minimally invasive surgery over the last three decades has rendered laparoscopic surgery the mainstay of management for surgical pathology during pregnancy. In the present meta-review, we compiled the available evidence on the safety of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgeries during pregnancy, based on relevant systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analyses (MA). A systematic review was performed for articles published until February 2024 in English using PubMed/MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online) and Google Scholar based on predefined selection and exclusion criteria. We implemented the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and included SRs and MAs examining women of childbearing age (population) who had undergone laparoscopic surgery or robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy (intervention). The presence of comparison to open surgery was desirable but not mandatory (comparator). The included studies should necessarily report on fetal loss (outcome), and optionally on other metrics of fetal, maternal, or operative performance. We considered SRs/MAs analyzing randomized trials, observational studies, case reports, and case series (study design). The methodological quality of SRs/MAs not exclusively including case reports and case series was assessed with the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 instrument. A total of 1229 articles were screened, of which 78 were potentially eligible. Of these, 33 articles met our inclusion criteria, 18 containing SRs only and 15 SRs with MA. The examined disciplines were laparoscopic appendectomy (10 studies, 30.3%), laparoscopic cerclage for cervical insufficiency (eight studies, 24.2%), adnexal-ovarian laparoscopic surgery (five studies, 15.2%), laparoscopic cholecystectomy and biliary tree exploration (three studies, 9.1%), laparoscopic myomectomy (two studies, 6.1%), and one study each for laparoscopic surgery regarding pancreatic indications, adrenal indications, and bariatric complications (3.0%). The odds ratio/relative risk for fetal loss rate ranged from 0-1.9, with variable statistical significance depending on the discipline. Twenty-three out of the 33 studies were submitted to quality evaluation with the AMSTAR 2 instrument, with three being of "low quality" (13.0%) and the remaining 20 of "critically low quality" (87.0%). In conclusion, the widespread acceptance of laparoscopic surgery for treating surgical pathology during pregnancy is substantiated by heterogeneous and low-quality evidence. Literature mainly revolves around laparoscopic appendectomy, whereas other disciplines that may commonly arise during pregnancy, such as cholecystectomy and the acute abdomen following bariatric surgery, are underrepresented in the literature. Factors such as anatomical alterations that may affect surgical access, surgeon's expertise, and the biological course of the underlying pathology should be taken into consideration when selecting the appropriate mode of operating during pregnancy.

Anesthesia Management and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Surgery for Early Pregnant Women with Tubal Pregnancy:a Report of 48 Cases

Minimally-invasive Management of Intramural Ectopic Pregnancy: an Eight-Case Series and Literature Review

Treatment Effects of Laparoscopy Versus Laparotomy on Heterotopic Pregnancy after in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer.

Management of Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy During First Trimester Pregnancy

[Effect of Laparoscopic Surgery under Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Pregnancy Outcomes of Heterotopic Pregnancies].

[Effect of Different Laparoscopic Procedures for Hydrosalpinx on Pregnancy Outcome of Embryo Transfer].

Clinical Analysis on Laparoscopic Operation for Intra- and Extra-Uterine Pregnancy

Clinical Analysis on 68 Cases Undergoing Laparoscopic Tubal Anastomosis

Increasing trends of laparoscopic procedures in non‐obstetric surgery during pregnancy over 17 years at a single center: Retrospective case–control study

Laparoscopic Surgery During Pregnancy: A Meta-Review and Quality Analysis Using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 Instrument

Laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy

Findings from the use of spinal anesthesia in the laparoscopic treatment of extrauterine pregnancy: could it represent an alternative to general anesthesia?

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under Combined Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia in the First Trimester of Pregnancy—Case Report and Literature Review

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Pregnancy: A Seven-Year Retrospective Study From an Australian Tertiary Center

Cost Analysis of Laparoscopy in Treatment of Tubal Pregnancy

Laparoscopic surgery for adnexal masses in the third trimester of pregnancy:4 cases report and literature review

Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Conventional Multi-port Laparoscopic Surgery for Tubal Pregnancy

Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic treatment of tubal adhesion and tubal distal occlusion

Comparative analysis of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the management of ovarian cyst during pregnancy

Laparoscopic Treatment for Interstitial Tubal Pregnancy:a Simple,Quick,and Safe Method

Laparoscopic Surgical Skills for Treatment of Interstitial Pregnancy