Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To compare the safety and effectiveness of two minimally invasive approaches for multi-vessel coronary revascularization.METHODS:From August 2014 to February 2017, 70 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting in Peking University Third Hospital were randomly divided into two groups. In one group, 40 patients underwent staged-hybrid coronary revascularization (staged-HCR) treatment; in the other group, 30 patients underwent minimally invasive total arterial revascularization with bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA). In staged -HCR group, the patients underwent minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure for treatment of multi-vessel disease. In BITA group, the patients underwent total arterial coronary artery bypass grafting with composite "Y" BITA graft. Preoperative and postoperative data of the two groups, including postoperative blood usage, mechanical ventilation time, domiciling duration in intensive care unit (ICU), major adverse cerebral and cardiovascular event (MACCE), and postoperative coronary angiography results were compared, in order to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of these surgical approaches.RESULTS:The preoperative characteristics of 70 patients in the two groups showed no significant difference. All the patients underwent successfully, elective minimally invasive multi-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting as scheduled preoperatively. Postoperative result showed the patients in staged-HCR group took advantages in less postoperative mechanical ventilation time [Staged-HCR group (11.2±8.7) h vs. BITA group (18.3±9.1) h, P=0.013], shorter domiciling duration in ICU [Staged-HCR group (26.29±4.05) h vs. BITA group (44.74±28.75) h, P=0.022], and less total drainage [Staged-HCR group (695.57±250.46) mL vs. BITA group (1 103.26±547.44) mL, P=0.03] than the patients in the group of minimally invasive total arterial revascularization with BITA. Postoperative in hospital coronary angiography showed satisfactory graft patency rates in both groups [97.5% in Staged-HCR group vs. 97.8% in BITA group]. No MACCE occurred in both groups during hospitalization.CONCLUSION:Staged-HCR is a feasible method for the treatment of multi-vessel revascularization involving right coronary artery. Minimally coronary revascularization with BITA is associated with superior long-term graft patency and it's recommended for patients who could not tolerate dual-antiplatelet therapy. This study shows that both minimally invasive surgical approaches are safe and effective for treatment of patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease.

Comparison Between Two-staged Hybrid Procedure and Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass for Multiple Coronary Artery Revascularization

Short-term and Long-term Postoperative Safety of Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Coronary Heart Disease: A Meta-analysis for Randomized Controlled Trials.

Selective Two-staged Hybrid Coronary Revascularization for Patients with Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

Staged hybrid coronary revascularization for treatment of multi-vessel coronary artery disease

Mid-term follow-up outcomes of 2-staged hybrid coronary revascularization compared with off-pump coronary artery bypass for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

The Clinical Experience of 2-staged Hybrid Procedure for Performing the Coronary Artery Revascularization

[Comparison of Outcomes of Two Minimally Invasive Approaches for Multi-Vessel Coronary Revascularization].

Feasibility and Safety of 2-staged Hybrid Technique for Treating Coronary Artery Disease Patients With Multi-vessel Lesions

Comparing clinical outcomes of hybrid coronary revascularization with open coronary artery bypass in patients with multi-vessels lesions

One-Stop Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

One-stop Hybrid Cardiac Surgery for Adults with Complex Heart Disease

Efficacy and safety of "2-staged" Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Using Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Y Graft for Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical experience of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy for staged hybrid coronary revascularization

Mid-term Outcomes of“2-staged”Hybrid Coronary Revascularization in Treating 73 Patients With Multi-vessel Coronary Artery Disease

[Comparison between hybrid surgical procedure--intraoperative angioplasty and cross-over bypass with aorto-bifemoral bypass in revascularization of iliac arteries]

Comparison of hybrid procedure and open surgical revascularization for multilevel infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease.

Comparison of a coronary bypass surgery using a combination of both on-pump beating heart and cardioplegic arrest with conventional coronary bypass surgery using cardioplegic arrest on-pump

Comparison between Off-Pump and On-Pump Beating Heart Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Comparison of Clinical Effects Between Left Chest Small Incision and Median Incision Multi-arterial Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Revascularization Techniques

Comparative Study of Minimally Invasive Directly Bypass Grafting With Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery and Conventional Off-pump Bypass Grafting for Treating Multi-vessel Lesion Coronary Artery Disease