Comparison Between Truview EVO2 and Macintosh Laryngoscopes in Endotreacheal Intubation for Patients with Restricted Neck Movement

张耕,韩永正,李民,王军,郭向阳

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2014.12.003

2014-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical application between Truview EVO 2 and Macintosh laryngoscopes in endotreachal intubation for patients with restricted neck movement. Methods Forty-nine patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation were enrolled. After intravenous anesthetic induction, orotracheal intubation was randomly performed by an experienced anesthesiologist with both Truview EVO 2 and Macintosh laryngoscopes. Then the patient was intubated with the laryngoscope with better view. Parameters were recorded, including Cormack-Lehane ( C-L) grade of laryngeal view, the laryngeal exposuring time, and hemodynamic changes during intubation. Results Better C-L grade of laryngeal view was achieved in the Truview EVO2 laryngoscope as compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope (Z=-5.488, P=0.000).The laryngeal exposuring time of Truview EVO2 laryngoscopy was longer than that of Macintosh laryngoscope [(15.9 ±6.7) s vs.(12.3 ±4.5) s, t=4.304, P =0.000].There was no significantly difference in hemodynamic changes between Truview EVO 2 and Macintosh laryngoscopes(P>0.05). Conclusions In patients with limitation of neck movement, the Truview EVO2 laryngoscope is more feasible and effective than Macintosh laryngoscope in orotracheal intubalion. The Truview EVO2 laryngoscope is a valuable tool for managing difficult airway for restricted neck movements.