Comparison of efficacy and safety between with and without tourniquet under the program of expert consensus statement on anti-coagulation sequential anti-fibrinolysis during primary total knee arthroplasty

Jun MA,Zeyu HUANG,Duan WANG,Jinwei XIE,Bin XU,Fuxing PEI,Bin SHEN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-9958.2017.05-07
2017-01-01
Abstract:Background:The role of a tourniquet during primary total knee arthroplasty is regarded as reducing intraopera-tive blood loss and improving visibility. Our goal is to investigate whether the tourniquet is still necessary for controlling in-traoperative blood loss when alternatives such as TXA are available. Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of prima-ry total knee arthroplasty without a tourniquet under the program of expert consensus statement on anti-coagulation sequen-tial anti-fibrinolysis. Methods:A total of 63 patients admitted in our hospital to undergo total knee arthroplasty were random-ized to two groups:non-tourniquet group (n=32) and tourniquet group (n=31). Patients in non-tourniquet group received in-travenously a dose of 20 mg/kg tranexamic acid (TXA) before skin incision and patients in tourniquet group were treated with tourniquet during operation, air inflation before skin incision and pressure set 100 mmHg higher than current systolic pressure. All patients were infused with TXA 1g at joint capsule closure when the operation was completed and TXA at a dose of 10 mg/kg additionally at 3, 6, 12, 24 h after anesthesia induction in accordance with expert consensus statement on anti-coagulation sequential anti-fibrinolysis. Enoxaparin of 0.2 ml was administered to all patients for anticoagulation at 6 h after operation and then every day 0.4 ml until hospital discharge. After discharge the patients took orally 10 mg Rivaroxa-ban once daily for two weeks. The main evaluation indicators included perioperative blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin, VAS score, swelling rate and range of motion. Results:Compared with the tourniquet group, operation duration and intraop-erative blood loss in non-tourniquet increased (P<0.05). Drainage volume was higher in tourniquet group than in non-tourni-quet group. The difference in dominant blood loss between the two groups was not statistically significant. Total blood loss and hidden blood loss calculated through Gross equation in non-tourniquet was lower than that in tourniquet group (P<0.05). Hemoglobin level and swelling rate in non-tourniquet group were superior to that in tourniquet group. VAS score in non-tourniquet group was lower significantly than that in tourniquet group at the day of operation and the second day after operation. There were no significant differences in VAS at the first and third days after operation, range of motion after oper-ation and rate of intraoperative complication between the two groups. Conclusions:Patients treated without a tourniquet dur-ing primary total knee arthroplasty in accordance with expert consensus statement on anti-coagulation sequential anti-fibri-nolysis do not have the dominant blood loss increased, have less hidden blood loss and total blood loss and have higher he-moglobin level and less postoperative pain and knee swelling.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?