Abstract:Objective To investigate whether anterior selective fusion (ASF) could save more distal fusion segments compared with posterior approach in the treatment of Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with long term follow-up. Methods A retrospective cohort study. From 2008 to 2011, 22 AIS girls with Lenke type 5 who underwent ASF or posterior selective fusion (PSF) with more than 8-year follow-up, were extracted from the database. 13 girls in the ASF group had an average age of 14.3 +/- 1.3 years and Risser sign of 3.3 +/- 1.1; 9 PSF girls had an average age of 16.2 +/- 3.6 years and Risser sign of 3.8 +/- 1.5. The radiographic outcome was compared between groups preoperatively, 6-month postoperatively, 8-year postoperatively and at last follow-up (>8 years). Results The average follow-up duration was 8.7 +/- 0.4 (ASF) and 8.8 +/- 0.5 (PSF) years, respectively. There was no significant difference at baseline in age, Risser sign and preoperative curve pattern in the coronal and sagittal plane between the groups (P > 0.05). The ASF group had significantly shorter fusion segments (5.1 +/- 0.6 vs. 7.0 +/- 1.3) and decreased upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) (T-11 +/- 0.8 vs. T-10 +/- 0.8) than the PSF (P < 0.05); while no significant difference was found in the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) and distal reserved segments (P > 0.05), which suggested that ASF could shorten the fusion segments by lowering UIV. The distal compensatory curve in the ASF group (9.0 degrees +/- 3.9 degrees) was significantly larger than in the PSF group (3.3 degrees +/- 2.4 degrees, P = 0.003), despite of no significant difference in the incidence of coronal imbalance (P > 0.05), indicating that both two approaches could obtain satisfactory correction in the coronal plane. In the sagittal plane, PSF patients had significantly larger lumbar lordosis (LL, 59.1 degrees +/- 10.5 degrees), thoracic kyphosis (TK, 37.2 degrees +/- 13.3 degrees) and proximal junctional angle (PJA, 13.3 degrees +/- 6.1 degrees) at the last follow-up than the ASF (LL: 43.4 degrees +/- 9.4 degrees; TK: 20.7 degrees +/- 8.4 degrees; PJA: 4.7 degrees +/- 3.4 degrees; P < 0.05), but without significant difference in proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (P > 0.05). After controlling for age, Risser sign, and radiographic parameters related to the primary curve pattern, shorter fusion segments and more distal reserved segments still remained significant in the ASF group with greater Risser sign (P < 0.05). No major intra- or post-operative complications occurred. Conclusions Both ASF and PSF could obtain satisfactory coronal and sagittal correction for Lenke 5 AIS; compared with PSF, ASF could shorten the fusion segments by lowering UIV, and save more distal fusion segments only in patients with greater skeletal maturity.

Postoperative shoulder balances of Lenke 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with preoperative right-elevated shoulder after selective thoracic fusion

[Analysis of Factors Associated with Postoperative Shoulder Balance in Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis].

Radiographic factors associated with shoulder imbalance immediately after operation in Lenke type 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing non-selective thoracic correction

Postoperative Lumbar Curve Progression Deteriorates Shoulder Imbalance in Patients with Lenke Type 2B/C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Who Underwent Selective Thoracic Fusion

Full fusion of proximal thoracic curve helps to prevent postoperative cervical tilt in Lenke type 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with right-elevated shoulder

Evaluation of the Radiographic Risk Factors of Postoperative Shoulder Imbalance in Adult Scoliosis

Does fusion to T2 compared with T3/T4 lead to improved shoulder balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with a double thoracic curve?

Role of Clavicle Chest Cage Angle Difference in Predicting Postoperative Shoulder Balance in Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients after Selective Posterior Fusion.

Postoperative Shoulder Balance in Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients with Large Thoracic Curve (cobb Angle ≥ 70 Degrees): a Radiographic Study

Increased proximal vertebral rotation is associated with shoulder imbalance after posterior spinal fusion for severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Anterior Selective Lumbar Fusion Saving More Distal Fusion Segments Compared with Posterior Approach in the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with Lenke Type 5: A Cohort Study with More Than 8-Year Follow-up

Preoperative Less Right Shoulder Elevation Had a Higher Risk of Postoperative Shoulder Imbalance When Main Thoracic Curve Shows Higher Correction Regardless of the Upper Instrumented Vertebra Level for Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Lenke Type 1

How can postoperative shoulder imbalance be prevented in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis type 2?

The Impact of Relative Curve Correction on Postoperative Shoulder Balance in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

[Influence of preoperative thoracic kyphosis on the sagittal profile of the lumbar spine in idiopathic thoracic scoliosis following selective thoracic fusion].

Three-dimensional Finite Element Simulation of Surgical Correction for Lenke 2 Type Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Does levelling of T1 tilt intra-operatively affect post-operative shoulder balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients?

The mechanisms underlying the variety of preoperative directionalities of shoulder tilting in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with double thoracic curve

Postoperative Coronal Imbalance in Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Evolution, Risk Factors, and Clinical Implications

Does Sacral Slanting Affect Postoperative Shoulder Balance in Patients with Lenke Type 2A Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

The effect of radiographic parameters associated with the lowest instrumented vertebrae on postopera-tive coronal trunk balance in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis