Anatomical comparison between posterior medial and lateral inverted L-shaped approach for the treatment of tibial plateau fracture involving posterior column*

Huifeng DING,Bin YU,Baoqing YU,Rongguang AO,Xiaowei HUANG,Longdian GU,Jifei SHI,Jianming HUANG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-9958.2015.04-014

2015-01-01

Abstract:Background:The posterior column of tibial plateau is easily injured and became fractured under the impact of the femoral condyle with the knee flexion. Some scholars proposed posterior approach which can make the fracture better exposed. In this article, we make an anatomical comparison between two approaches of the treatment for tibial plateau fracture involv-ing the posterior column. Objective:To dissect the knee of fresh Chinese cadavers and to compare anatomical differences between posterior medial and posterior lateral inverted L-shaped approach for the treatment of tibial plateau fracture involving the posterior column. Methods:Posterior medial and posterior lateral inverted L-shaped incisions were applied on the left and right knees, respec-tively, of 6 fresh adult cadavers by the same doctor. Photos were taken and metrical data were recorded for the different win-dows during the procedure of anatomy. Results:The height of the lateral window in the right knee was significantly larger than that in the left one ([7.86 ± 1.31] vs [4.35 ± 1.79], P<0.05), no significant difference was found in the width of the lateral window between the right and the left knee (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in the height or width of the middle window between the right and the left knee (P>0.05). Neither was the height or width of the medial window (P>0.05). Conclusions:The fracture can be exposed effectively by both posterior medial and posterior lateral inverted L-shaped ap-proach for the treatment of tibial plateau fracture involving the posterior column. Besides, lateral window can be better ex-posed for reduction and internal fixation by lateral inverted L-shaped approach.