Curative effect of anteromedial approach versus anterolateral approach for type C pilon fracture

Jianjun LI,Hongbin ZHANG,Zhixin WU,Peixun ZHANG,Hailin XU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-1439.2014.06-012
2014-01-01
Abstract:Background:Type C pilon fracture is usually caused by high-energy injuries and the treatment is very difficult. Correct oper-ative approach is closed related to therapeutic effect. <br> Objective:To compare curative effects of internal fixation through anteromedial approach versus anterolateral approach for type C pilon fracture. <br> Methods: A total of 43 patients with type C pilon fracture underwent open reduction and internal fixation between May 2008 and September 2011. There were 28 males and 15 females with an average age of 35.3 years (range, 18-64 years). The operation was performed through anteromedial approach in 26 cases and through anterolateral approach in 17 cases. Surgi-cal timing, fracture healing time, Burwell-Charnley radiological score and Tornetta function scores of ankle joint were com-pared between two approaches. <br> Results:There were no significant differences in surgical timing, fracture healing time, Burwell-Charnley radiological score, or Tornetta function scores of ankle joint between two approaches (P>0.05). <br> Conclusions:There are no significant differences in surgical timing, fracture healing time, reduction quality or ankle joint function recovery between anterolateral approach and anteromedial approach for the treatment of type C pilon fracture. The choice of surgical approach should be based on injured bone size, position, fracture configuration, displacement and condi-tion of skin and soft issue.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?