Comparison between arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation with open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of Schatzker's type Ⅰ-Ⅳ tibial plateau fractures

Shi-kun WANG,Zong-xin SHI,Yun-hai CONG,Li-chao WANG,Xin-min LIU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2017.06.011
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic reduction-internal fixation (ARIF) and open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) for tibial plateau fractures.Methods From March 2010 to December 2014,110 patients were included in this study based on fracture patterns and divided into two groups.The data of each group were collected for statistical analysis on the following.Results The duration of operation was (119.3±17.2)min in group ARIF and (90.4± 11.1)min in group ORIF (P <0.05).In group ARIF,however,51 of 53 patients obtained an anatomical reduction,whereas in group ORIF,only 48 of 57 patients had an anatomical reduction.Furthermore,the postoperative rehabilitation was faster in group ARIF (P <0.05).There was no significant difference between both groups in terms of blood loss,postoperative complications,and post-operative function(P >0.05).Conclusion ARIF can improve the clinical efficacy in the treatment of tibial plateau fractures,which can improve fractures reduction and promote patients' early rehabilitation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?