Long-segment spinal fusion at different distal instrumented vertebrae for treatment of adult lumbar scoliosis: a meta-analysis

刘立洋,陈佳海,文天用,王德利,阮狄克
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2017.05.10
2017-01-01
Abstract:[Objective] To investigate the postoperative complications and clinical outcome of long-segment spinal fusion at different distal instrumented vertebrae in the treatment of adult lumbar scoliosis.[Methods] A literature search was performed in PubMed,Ovid,EMBASE,Web of science,the Cochrane Library,CBM,CMCI,and CNKI to collect the articles published from January 1996 to December 2015.After data extraction and quality evaluation,which were performed by two reviewers independently according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria,the data were analyzed by Review Manager 5.2.[Results] A total of 5 articles involving 421 patients were included in the analysis.Of the 421 cases,L5 was selected as the distal instrumented vertebra in 179 cases (L5 group) and S1 in the other 242 cases (S1 group).Meta-analysis showed that the L5 group had a significantly higher postoperative pseudarthrosis formation rate than the S1 group (P=0.01).However,there were no significant differences in postoperative renovation rate (P=0.10),postoperative incidence of adjacent segment disease (ASD) (P=-0.06),postoperative improvement degree of Cobb angle (P=0.74),postoperative improvement degree of coronal vertical axis (P=0.93),postoperative improvement degree of lumbar lordosis (P=0.44),and postoperative improvement degree of sagittal vertical axis (P=0.57) between the two groups.[Conclusions] For adult lumbar scoliosis,L5 is better than S1 as the distal instrumented vertebra.Due to the quality and quantity of included articles,the conclusion still needs to be confirmed by more high-quality randomized controlled studies.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?