Abstract:PurposeThe alignment obtained after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) influences the risk of failure. Kinematic alignment after UKA based on Cartier angle restauration is likely to improve clinical outcomes compared with mechanical alignment. The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of implant alignment and native knee restoration after UKA using the conventional techniques on clinical outcomes.MethodsThis retrospective study included 144 medial UKA patients from 2015 to 2020. Radiographic measurements were performed pre- and postoperatively. Outliers were defined as follows: Δ Cartier > 3° (difference between the preoperative and postoperative Cartier angle); Δ MPTA (Medial Proximal Tibial angle) and postoperative TCA (Tibial Coronal component Angle) > 3° (difference between the positioning of the tibial implant and the preoperative proximal tibial deformity). The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the International Knee Society (IKS) Function and Knee score, the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and the Subjective Knee Value (SKV) were evaluated.A Student t test or a non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used for non-normal data to compare pre- and postoperative values for functional scores and angular measurements. The correlation of postoperative angles with functional outcomes was assessed by the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.Results During the inclusion period, 214 patients underwent medial UKA, 71 patients were excluded, and 19 were lost to follow-up leaving 124 patients with 144 knees (20 bilateral UKA) included for analysis with a mean follow-up of 54.7 months ± 22.1 (24–95). The Δ Cartier was significantly correlated with IKS function (R2 = 0.06, p < 0.001) and FJS (R2 = 0.05, p < 0.01) scores. The Δ preoperative MPTA–TCA was significantly correlated (p < 0.001) with KOOS (R2 = 0.38), IKS Knee (R2 = 0.17), IKS function (R2 = 0.34), SKV (R2 = 0.08), and FJS (R2 = 0.37) scores. In subgroup analysis, non-outliers (< 3°) for Δ preoperative MPTA–TCA had better KOOS score (Δ = 23.5, p < 0.001) and IKS Function (Δ = 17.7, p < 0.001) compared to outliers (> 3°) patients.Conclusion Functional results after medial UKA can be influenced by implant alignment in the coronal plane with slight clinical improvement when positioning the tibial implant close to the preoperative tibial deformity, rather than by restoring the Cartier angle. This series suggests the interest of a more personalized alignment strategy, but these results will have to be confirmed by other controlled studies.Level of evidenceIV, retrospective case series.

Preoperative orientation of tibial prosthesis in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: What is the optimal alignment correction to achieve success? The role of kinematic alignment

Restoration of preoperative tibial alignment improves functional results after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs high tibial osteotomy for knee osteoarthritis: A comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, is it superior to high tibial osteotomy in treating unicompartmental osteoarthritis? A meta-analysis and systemic review

Clinical outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in the same patient

Robotic arm-assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty resulted in superior radiological accuracy: a propensity score-matched analysis

The mid-term outcomes of mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient

Intraoperative Sensor Technology Quantifies Inter-Prosthesis Pressure for Predicting Lower Limb Alignment after Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

A Novel Extramedullary Technique to Guide Femoral Bone Preparation in Mobile Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Based on Tibial Cut and Overall Alignment.

Taux De Révision Précoce Plus Faible Après Une Arthroplastie Du Genou Unicompartimentale D’oxford Non Cimentée Versus La Version Cimentée De La Prothèse Unicompartimentale D’oxford : Méta-Analyse

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus high tibial osteotomy for medial knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Preserving coronal knee alignment of the knee (CPAK) in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty correlates with superior patient-reported outcomes

Comparison of Early Complication Rates After High Tibial Osteotomy Versus Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty for Knee Osteoarthritis

Factors predicting lower limb alignment after Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

A clinical study on preoperative valgus stress radiography for evaluating alignment changes of the lower limb after Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Preservation of prearthritic coronal knee phenotype and prearthritic coronal alignment yielded improved Kujala scores following ligament‐guided medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty restores pre-arthritic coronal alignment and achieves satisfactory functional outcomes: a retrospective study

Trends in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty among 138 international experienced arthroplasty knee surgeons

Correlation Between Preoperative and Postoperative Alignment and Kinematic Gait in Total Knee Arthroplasty

[Clinical results of medial mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using kinematic alignment technique with at least 5-years follow-up]