Preoperative orientation of tibial prosthesis in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

杨涛,薛华明,马童,文涛,张颖川,涂意辉
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2017.07.03
2017-01-01
Abstract:[Objective] To explore the clinical outcome of preoperative precise orientating of tibial prosthesis in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).[Methods] Between June 2014 and December 2014,116 consecutive patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritis were treated with UKA.The patients were randomly divided into the trial group (preoperative precise orientating group,60 knees) and the control group (56 knees).In the trial group,the guide rod parallel was adjusted to tibia crest in the coronal plane and the distal guide rod was regulated to 1.80cm far from skin in the sagittal plane.While in the control group,conventional Oxford MP process was used to ensure the tibia guide rod parallel to long axis of the tibia both in the coronal and sagittal plane.The postoperative tibial component valgus/varus angle (TCVA),tibial component posterior slope angle (TCPSA) and HSS scores were measured and compared between two groups.[Result] All patients were followed up for an average of 12 months.The postoperative tibial component valgus/varus angle (TCVA) were (0.92±1.81) ° in the trial group and (1.61±2.51) ° in the control group respectively (t=-1.072,P=0.288).Correspondingly,the tibial component posterior slope angle (TCPSA) were (6.91-±0.85) ° and (7.32±1.73) °respectively (t=-1.081,P=-0.284).Although there was no significant difference between the two groups,the postoperative tibial component valgus/varus angle (TCVA) and tibial component posterior slope angle (TCPSA) in the trial group were closer to 0 ° and 7 ° respectively,indicating the position of tibial prosthesis was more precise.Preoperatively,and at 2 weeks,6 months and one year postoperatively,no differences were found in HSS scores between the two groups (P > 0.05).[Conclusion] The preoperative precise orientating does improve the accuracy of tibial prosthesis position in UKA with satisfactory clinical outcome.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?