Abstract:Objective:To study the reason for failed fixation with dynamic hip screws (DHS) and the indications for DHS fixation in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture based on the lever-balance-reconstruction theory.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed of the data of 32 patients with intertrochanteric fracture who had been treated by DHS fixation at Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Peking University People's Hospital from January 1999 to December 2019. There were 22 males and 10 females, aged from 34 to 91 years (average, 67.7 years). By the AO classification, 15 fractures were type 31-A1, 13 ones type 31-A2, and 4 ones type 31-A3. According to the lever-balance-reconstruction theory, after the position of postoperative fulcrum was determined depending on the relationship between fracture line and internal fixation, the medial and lateral force arms were measured after internal fixation. The 32 patients were divided into 2 groups according to the position of fulcrum after internal fixation. In group A of 13 patients, the fulcrum was located in or within the center of the medullary cavity; in group B of 19 patients, the fulcrum was located outside the center of the medullary cavity. The incidence of internal fixation failure was compared between the 2 groups.Results:Internal fixation failure occurred in 15 of the 32 patients: cutting out of the head and neck screws without penetration in 2 cases, screw withdrawal in 8 cases, hip varus deformity in 10 cases, and femoral neck shortening in 15 cases. The 2 groups were comparable because there were no statistically significant differences in their preoperative general data or types of internal fixation between them except AO classification ( P>0.05). The length of medial force arm (power arm) averaged 51.12 mm (from 39.4 to 57.9 mm) and the length of lateral force arm (resistance arm) 23.37 mm (from 15.1 to 31.0 mm) in group A where 3 patients experienced internal fixation failure after operation; the length of medial force arm (power arm) averaged 63.71 mm (from 52.3 to 74.5 mm) and the length of lateral force arm (resistance arm) 9.94 mm (from 3.1 to 18.3 mm) in group B where 12 patients experienced internal fixation failure after operation. There was a significant difference between the 2 groups in internal fixation failure ( P=0.036). Conclusions:In the DHS fixation of intertrochanteric fracture, the postoperative fixation failure is associated with the fulcrum position after reconstruction. DHS is only indicated for intertrochanteric fractures whose fracture line (post-reconstruction fulcrum) is near and inside the center of the medullary cavity, but not for those whose fracture line (post-reconstruction fulcrum) is outside the medullary cavity.

Risk and curative effect in treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures in aged patients with dynamic hip screw

Comparison of MTDHS and DHS in Treatment of Comminuted Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures

Effect of dynamic hip screw on the treatment of femoral neck fracture in the elderly

Clinical and Radiographic Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty with Collum Femoris Preserving Prosthesis:an over 5 Years Follow Up

[Mid-Term Follow-Up Study of Hip Arthroplasty for Internal Fixation Failure of Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures in the Elderly].

Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-Rotation and Dynamic Hip Screw in Treatment of Osteoporotic Intertrochanteric Fracture: a Contrast Study

The Clinical Study of Therapeutic Effect of Artificial Femoral HeadReplacement in the Treatment of Old Patients with IntertrochantericFemoral Fracture

Clinical outcomes of three treatments for intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients

Comparison of the Effects for Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fracture for the Old People by Micro-trauma Dynamic Hip Screw and Convention Dynamic Hip Screw

The Clinical Study of the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures in the Elderly with DHS, Gamma Nail and PFN

[Minimal invasion and closed reduction with external fixation for elderly femoral intertrochanteric fracture].

Dynamic Hip Screw Plus Hollow Screws of Nail in Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fracture

Selection of Internal Fixation Methods for Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures in Aged Patients

Treating Serious Pulverous Intertrochanteric Fracture of Femur by Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and Tension Band

Comparison of the Dynamic Hip Screw with the Dynamic Hip External Fixator for Intertrochanteric Fractures: Report of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Treatment of complicated femoral subtrochanteric fracture by dynamic condylar screw

Minimally invasive versus conventional fixation of stable intertrochanteric fracture by dynamic hip screw – A prospective study comparing the two techniques

Reason for failed fixation with dynamic hip screws for intertrochanteric fracture: analysis based on the lever-balance-reconstruction theory

Dynamic hip screw versus proximal femoral nail in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of femur

Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures by Total Hip Replacement and Compressed Hollow Screws in the Aged

Total hip arthroplasty for intertrochanteric fracture fixation failure