Using The Antibiotic-Loaded Cement Articulating Spacer with the Original Femoral Head Prosthesis Remained in Treatment of Infected Hip Replacement

马俊,黄泽宇,黄强,沈彬,康鹏德,周宗科,杨静,裴福兴

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13795/j.cnki.sgkz.2015.10.004

2015-01-01

Abstract:Objective To describe a novel method of making antibiotic-loaded cement articulating spacer which keep the original femoral head prosthesis remained and to evaluate its efficiency in the two-stage revision of infected total hip arthroplas-ty(THA)and,summarize the clinical experience. Methods From November 2011 to July 2012,eleven patients with infected THA treated with two-stage revision protocol in our center were reviewed. All of them were debridement thoroughly and followed by implantation of an antibiotic-loaded cement articulating spacer with the original femoral head prosthesis. Two-stage revisions were not performed until the infection were controlled. Evaluations of the efficiency of infection control,occurrence of complica-tions,the function and satisfaction of the patients were made at each follow-up time points. Results Full follow-up were a-chieved in all the patients. The mean follow-up time since the second-stage revision was 12. 6 ± 2. 5 months. After the first-stage revision all the patients could extension the hip straightly,the mean flexion degree was(89. 1 ± 6. 3)° and the mean ab-duction angle was(31. 8 ± 5. 1)°. The Harris scores increasedfrom the preoperative(40. 5 ± 9. 9)to the postoperative(79. 3 ± 4. 5). After the second-stage revision it increased to 91. 7 ± 2. 6. No signs of relapse of the infection were observed in all pa-tients at the final follow-up. Dislocation of the original femoral head prosthesis was observed in one patient 3 weeks after the first-stage revision and manipulative reduction was failed twice in this patient. The broken of spacer was observed in one pa-tient. Conclusion Using antibiotic-loaded cement articulating spacer with the original femoral head prosthesis remained in the first-stage revision can make the performance much easier,and itsˊefficiency of infection control is quite satisfactory. What is more,by doing so the patients can gained a better hip range of motion. However,cautions must be paid to it’s had reduction af-ter dislocation and broken of spacer. By improving the method,these complication can be avoid.