Ipsilateral fractures of the ulnar styloid with distal radius fractures; to fix or not? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Prasoon Kumar,Ankit Dadra,Rajesh Kumar Rajnish,Siddhartha Sharma,Sandeep Patel,Mandeep Singh Dhillon,Sameer Aggarwal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102519
2024-08-22
Abstract:Background: The most common upper limb fracture encountered in clinical practice is distal radius fracture (DRF). They frequently occur due to falls onto an outstretched hand or other traumatic incidents, resulting in a break in the radius near the wrist joint. DRFs often present a spectrum of injuries and are a common reason for emergency department visits, affecting approximately one out of every six patients seeking medical attention in this setting. Methods: This systematic review was performed according to the guidelines of PRISMA, using the electronic database search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, and the protocol for the review was registered to PROSPERO. All comparative study designs (prospective or retrospective) that compared fixation of ulnar styloid and no fixation in a case of ipsilateral distal end radius fracture were included. Results: The current review analyzed 336 patients from five studies, two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), two prospective, and one retrospective comparative study. The meta-analysis revealed a significantly higher rate of union in fixation group than the no-fixation group, with an odds ratio of 10.29 (95%CI 4.74, 22.32; p < 0.00001). However, no significant differences were found in other radiological parameters such as radial inclination, volar angle, and ulnar variance. Regarding functional outcomes, the result was equivocal for the two groups regarding DASH/quick DASH score, Modified Mayo Wrist score MD of 0.22 [95 % CI -1.84, 2.28, p = 0.83; I2 = 0 %], grip strength, range of motion, and overall complications OR of 0.53 (95 % CI 0.08, 3.47; p = 0.51; I2 = 86 %), but higher occurrence of ulnar-sided pain, hardware prominence, and paraesthesias. Conclusion: Fixation of ulnar styloid in conjunction with DRF does not significantly benefit patients. Despite better styloid union rates, it increases implant-related complications without improving final function, range of motion, stability, or grip strength. Patients may experience increased ulnar-sided pain due to implant prominence. Therefore, non-fixation of the ulnar styloid process is recommended as it offers no significant advantages.