Clinical value of energy spectrum CT in the differential diagnosis of liver cancer and FNH

Feifei Li,Jialin Shen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2017.05.011
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the clinical value of energy spectrum CT in the differential diagnosis of liver cancer and hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH). Methods A retrospective study was conducted in 57 patients with hepatoproliferative lesions (including 35 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 22 cases of FNH) from May 2014 to April 2016.Statistical analysis were performed by using SPSS 18.0 software.Clinical data of patients, including contrast-to-noise ratio ( CNR), normalized iodine concentration (NIC), and lesion-to-normal ratio (LNR) , were expressed as -x ±s and compared between two groups at different energy levels by using t test.A P value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference. Results CNR value was optimal at 50 keV in HCC group (3.6 ±1.2), significantly lower than that in FNH (8.3 ±2.2) under the same energy, P <0.05.The optimal CNR was 70keV, (1.9 ±0.1)in group of portal vein HCC and 50keV, (1.2 ±0.3)in group of FNH, respectively.In all patients, the trend of CNR values was similar in both portal vein and arterial phase , in which the CNR values decreased following with the increase of single photon energy , except for very few energy points .NIC values of the two groups were: arterial phase, liver cancer group(0.3 ±0.1), FNH(0.5 ±0.1);venous phase, liver cancer group (0.5 ±0.2), FNH(0.9 ±0.2).LNR values of the two groups were: arterial phase, liver cancer group (2.9 ±0.3), FNH(6.1 ±0.1);venous phase, liver cancer group (1.1 ±0.1), FNH (1.4 ±0.2).The NIC values in all patients of the HCC group were significantly lower than those of the FNH group when compared between the portal vein and arterial phase , P <0.05. Conclusion The energy spectrum CT is more accurate and has great clinical value in the differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and FNH .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?